No, i wouldn't have done it because they didn't ask me to. Yes, it would be correct.
I'm not exactly sure but my guess would be that directly contacting someone would mean communicating with someone (or something) while the other person can hear or see you, or when you are there in person. Indirectly contacting someone would mean you would cause someone (or something) to contact someone (or something.)
Both; for is a person & of would be for something besides.
A helpful person, is someone who helps someone WITHOUT seeking something in return. This person can also be said to be advantageous.
It means you are talking to a person from the southern United States who thinks someone or something is very smart, however, I would not count on their opinion necessarily being correct.
A name is for someone to call you something. Would you want someone to call you something or say,"Hey........um.....you person over there!"
Yes. If the book is about one person then it would be centered around that person.
Honestly, both are polite and correct. I would use "nice speaking with you" over the phone and "nice speaking to you" in person. Because over the phone your speaking with something. In person your talking directly to someone.
The word could is used to mean that someone has the ability to do something. Would is used to mean that the person is wiling to do something.
A Vague would be a person that is daydreaming or not paying attention to something or someone.
I would say someone who tempts is a tempter and the person being tempted is the temptie, but I don't know if this is accepted as correct.
It would be more correct to say, someone who.
No. That is not the right meaning for that. The right meaning would be that you would do something to someone that they did to you or the other person.