You are not providing enough information for an answer. We know what they are selling for, but you did not say how much they cost to produce. Profit is how much more they sell for that what they cost to produce. If each cost 25 to produce, and sold for 30, then the profit of each sale is 5, or 25 if you sell 5 of them. If each cost 35 to produce, and sells for 30, you lose 5 on each sale.
According to this concept "expected losses are losses but expected gains are not gains". On the basis of this concept closing stock is valued at cost price or market price, whichever is lower. Provision for bad and doubtful debts are maintained.
Profits, as a percentage of total sales is 100*profits/value of sales.profit/cost price x 100
No, a reduction in a company's share price has no effect on the company's profits.
It is possible to make profits by buying shares, property etc. at a low price and then selling at a higher price. Profits made in this way are called capital gains and are subject to tax by the government. Profits mad ein this wayare called capital gains and are subjectto tax by the government. Profits made on anindividual's home, private cars and assurance policies are not subject to capital gains tax. Hope this was helpful! -Pinkmouse
For example, if the per-unit variable cost is $15 and selling price per unit is $20, then the contribution margin is equal to $5. The contribution margin may provide a $5 contribution toward the reduction of fixed costs or a $5 contribution to profits.
It is called the equilibrium price.
A profit is an amount of money that is more than it's original price On the other hand, a Loss is an amount of money that is less than it's original price
According to this concept "expected losses are losses but expected gains are not gains". On the basis of this concept closing stock is valued at cost price or market price, whichever is lower. Provision for bad and doubtful debts are maintained.
The correct formula when markup is based on the selling price is selling price is equal to the markup plus the cost. This enables traders make profits.
Firms are price takers, price is equal to marginal costs, demand is perfectly elastic, i.e. constant and horizontal, the firms makes zero Economics profits.
Firms are price takers, price is equal to marginal costs, demand is perfectly elastic, i.e. constant and horizontal, the firms makes zero Economics profits.
Shareholders wealth can be maximized by maximizing Return on Equity, which is equal to Net Income divided by equity. The higher the net income the more the stock price will increase which will maximize their wealth.
Firms are price takers, price is equal to marginal costs, demand is perfectly elastic, i.e. constant and horizontal, the firms makes zero economics profits.
what about them? profits are 0 price=marginal cost all costs are variable optimal allocation of inputs is where marginal rate of technical substitution is equal to the price ratio of the inputs.
It's profits are increased.
Under perfect competition, since there is no room in perfect competition to earn any abnormal profits
this video presentation here explains everything, and they say some pretty interesting stuff about 45 minutes in