Yes, it does. Higher density means being more dense than something else. In that light, that makes it a relative or comparitive term. But you are correct. Higher density means something is more dense than something else.
It depends on the volume (space taken up) of the matter, if more molecules are added to the matter with the same mass, then its density increases. Example: You have a solid and a liquid with the same mass. The Solid has more particles than the liquid of the same mass, so it has a greater density.
yes and no, when something is dense, the molecules are closer together, therefore it contains more of them, but a spoonful of water and a spoonful of honey with the same number of molecules would have a different density.
Density means the amount of weight per unit volume, so while density does not equate to weight, density times volume equals weight.
No. Density is mass per unit of volume.
Weight = (density) times (volume)The definition of density is mass/volume .Now [ weight = mass x gravity ], so [ mass = weight/gravity ], and [ density = weight/gravity x volume ] .So Weight = (density) x (volume) x (gravity)
Converting volume into weight requires density as the conversion factor. Volume x density = weight (as long as the density is given in terms of weight per unit volume).
Relative density, or specific gravity, is the ratio of the density (mass of a unit volume) of a substance to the density of a given reference material. Specific gravity usually means relative density with respect to water.
milliliters is a measure of volume (how big?) and milligrams is a measure of mass (weight . . . sort of). You cannot convert from ml to mg or from mg to ml unless you know the density of the material being measured.
Hmmm... technically false. Density is mass/volume - it is an intrinsic property. Weight is subjective to the force of gravity, while density is not.
You cannot equate weight and volume without having the density or concentration
cannot equate weight and volume without the density of liquid or the concentration
It depends on the density of the substance, there is no way to equate weight (lbs) and volume (gallons) except by knowing the density of the substance concerned.
You can not equate mg (weight) with ml (volume) without specifying the density of the substance being measured.
You cannot equate weight and length without knowing the density, shape and possibly other dimensions
"oz" is a measure of weight/mass, "mls" is a measure of volume, you can not equate the two without knowing the density of the 650mls of the substance being measured.
You can not equate units of volume and weight directly.
A "quart" is a measure of volume. You can not equate a volume with a weight unless you know the density of the material. Apples are not of uniform density and there will be gaps between the apple slices. Therefore we can not give you a precise answer on the information presented in your question.
You cannot equate weight directly with length. You need to know the shape and dimensions to find the volume. You then need to know the density and apply it. You also have to convert units after that.
You cannot equate mass and volume without knowing the density. Remember, density is mass/volume
You can not equate grams and teaspoons without also knowing the density.
You cannot equate the two - quarts is a measure of volume and pounds is a measure of weight. If you want to convert between the two you will need to know the density of the substance being measured.