answersLogoWhite

0

No, it is not appropriate to leave out experimental results that do not support your hypothesis in the conclusion of an experiment. Transparent reporting of all results, whether they support or contradict the hypothesis, is essential for scientific integrity and the advancement of knowledge. Including negative or inconclusive results can provide valuable insights and help refine future research. Furthermore, cherry-picking data undermines the validity of the study and can mislead other researchers.

User Avatar

AnswerBot

2w ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

How does an experimental conclusion compare to a theory or hypothesis?

A hypothesis is an educated guess and a theory is close to what a hypothesis is. A theory is the scientific process that is thought to be true. An experimental conclusion is the results to an experiment.


What is a conclusion base on experiment?

A conclusion based on an experiment is a summary of the findings that interprets the results in relation to the original hypothesis. It reflects whether the data supports or refutes the hypothesis and discusses the implications of the results. Additionally, it may suggest further research or modifications to the experimental design for future studies. Overall, the conclusion provides insight into the significance of the experiment and its contributions to the field of study.


What must scientist do if the hypothesis is not supported by experimental results?

You can perform the experiment again to check for errors. The best option is to just state in the conclusion the sources of error and why the experiment didn't support the hypothesis. Remember the hypothesis is only an educated guess.


Will your hypothesis be a statement of your conclusion on the results of the experiment?

No


Will your hypothesis will be a statement of your conclusion on the results of the experiment?

false


At the end of an experiment what does the conclusion state?

The conclusions tell why the data support or reject the hypothesis.


What is the difference between a hypothesis and a conclusion?

The hypothesis is the guess you make before the experiment. The conclusion the summaryof you results, and you can discuss whether your hypothesis was correct or not.


What would be a logical conclusion for kaylas experiment?

To provide a logical conclusion for Kayla's experiment, one would need to evaluate the results against her initial hypothesis. If the data supports her hypothesis, she could conclude that her experimental conditions had the expected effect. Conversely, if the results contradict her hypothesis, she may need to reconsider her methodology or explore alternative explanations. Overall, the conclusion should summarize the findings and suggest potential implications or future research directions.


Does your conclusion support or reject your hyphothesis?

The conclusion either supports or rejects the hypothesis based on the data and results obtained during the experiment or study. If the conclusion aligns with the hypothesis, it supports it. If the conclusion contradicts the hypothesis, it rejects it.


A researcher finds that her data does not support her hypothesis what conclusion can she reach?

end the experiment and throw away the datarepeat the experiment until the hypothesis is supportedchange the hypothesisargue that the results were


Is this statement true or false What if your hypothesis will be a statement of your conclusion on the results of the experiment.?

That is not a statement it is a question


When you make a conclusion about an experiment what do you need to concider?

You need to consider the results, your hypothesis, and the variables and controls used throughout the experiment.