If you disobeyed the Nazi's laws, you would expect death very, very quickly. Their brutality knew no bounds when it came to concern the Jewish population.
If you are referring to the perpetrators: There were no official punishments for what we would consider morally dubious orders. People could request transfers from units who had to carry out these tasks. However the unofficial punishments were very bad. In a unit on the Eastern front; if a person did not want to participate, it meant that they were not as culpable as the rest of the unit and thus the unit would not trust them, this in a unit where everyone had to trust each other with their lives was very dangerous, so this person would be subject to anything from being shunned to being killed by their comrades. If a person requested a transfer, it could be declined because the commanders did not want stories to be spread.
It is about valuing one source, or type of source over another. They more have different ideas over why things happened, there is almost complete agreement over what happened. If the question refers specifically to the Holocaust, there is a need to separate out those historians who disagree over the interpretation of the actual evidence and those who ignore large parts of evidence because of their political agendas. Failure to recognize the magnitude or scope of the Holocaust is commonly called Holocaust Denial. Typically any number less than 4.5 million Jews as the death toll in the Holocaust (usually less than 1 million) is indicative of Holocaust Denial. The most common reason for Holocaust Denial is in order to delegitimize the State of Israel. In their view, the only reason why Israel is a legitimate country is because of the Holocaust and therefore if the Holocaust is shown to be false, Israel's raison d'etre melts away. (The argument is flawed since Zionism existed before the Holocaust and also helped numerous Jews in the Arab World who were not part of the Holocaust.) The other group that routinely engages in Holocaust Denial are Anti-Semites who see the Holocaust as a means for Jews to gain sympathy.
carbon monoxide
the Holocaust is a concept created after the events, as such it has no leader. The Holocaust was a set of actions perpetrated under the Nazi government which was led by Hitler. The Holocaust was orchestrated by Himmler and planned by Heydrich and actualised by the adminstration of Eichmann. However the order for it was signed by Goering. Pick which ever of those names you care to and there is an argument for any of them to be the 'commander of the Holocaust'.
The people in the holocaust who wore badges where Jewish. And they had to wear them when going outside in order to be recognised as Hitler had put in some rules they had to follow.
A historically false claim, it is not necessarily Iran, but their leaders who deny the Holocaust. They do this a part of a series of other absurd claims in order to justify destroying Israel.
I disobeyed a retraining order that i had on my husband what shall i do????? email bernie.cna@gmail.com
leaving his post
because they knew they were surrounded
I seriously doubt it. Remember when Oola disobeyed, her punishment was being eaten up by the rancor. So if Leia disobeyed, she would have been dead.
It puts the events in a chronological order, which some people use as a method to try to understand what happened.
The Sentinels guard the tomb of the Unknown Soldiers. It is said they disobeyed during Hurricane Isabel when they chose to stay instead of flee the area.
Contempt of court means the party has purposely disobeyed or ignored a court order. If the father disobeyed a court order the mother can file a motion that the court hold him in contempt of the court order.Any existing court orders are in effect until the contempt motion is heard by the court and a new order is issued.Mother is not in contempt of any court order.Contempt of court means the party has purposely disobeyed or ignored a court order. If the father disobeyed a court order the mother can file a motion that the court hold him in contempt of the court order.Any existing court orders are in effect until the contempt motion is heard by the court and a new order is issued.Mother is not in contempt of any court order.Contempt of court means the party has purposely disobeyed or ignored a court order. If the father disobeyed a court order the mother can file a motion that the court hold him in contempt of the court order.Any existing court orders are in effect until the contempt motion is heard by the court and a new order is issued.Mother is not in contempt of any court order.Contempt of court means the party has purposely disobeyed or ignored a court order. If the father disobeyed a court order the mother can file a motion that the court hold him in contempt of the court order.Any existing court orders are in effect until the contempt motion is heard by the court and a new order is issued.Mother is not in contempt of any court order.
Disobey is already a verb. This is because the word disobey portrays an action.Other verbs are disobeys, disobeying and disobeyed."I will disobey the order"."The citizens are disobeying"."The servant disobeyed and quit".
It was one of the things that the Nazis appealed to in order to get people to perpetrate the Holocaust
Charlie Peaceful bravery can be seen when he disobeyed the direct order and did so rightly in order to protect his comrade Tommy.
I believe it was because he disobeyed an order and returned to his estate to save his father.
Primarily in order to avoid a repetition.