answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Andrew jacksons policy of implementing the Indian removal act by evicting the Cherokee tribe threatened the constitutional principle of?

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Indian Removal Act threatened what constitutional principle?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Andrew Jackson's policy of implementing the Indian removal act 1830 by evicting the Cherokee tribe threatened the constitutional principle of?

equal protection under the law. The act violated the rights of the Cherokee to their ancestral lands and forced them to relocate against their will. This policy undermined the principles of justice and equality enshrined in the Constitution.


What constitutional powers were involved in the Indian removal act?

somebody please answere the question


What act moved native Americans west of the Mississippi river?

Indian Removal Act


What was Andrew Jackson trying to gain in his message to congress on Indian removal?

justification for the indian removal act


What was the main purpose of Andrew jacksons message in on Indian removal?

Indian removal.


When did the Indian removal start and end?

The Indian removal did start in 1830 and stopped in 1860. The Indian Removal Act was passed by the senate on April 24, 1830.


Where was the Indian territory in the Indian removal?

Oklahoma


How does Jackson's legacy of Indian removal affect his own legacy as president?

Legacy of indian Removal


What was the final phase of the Indian removal plan?

The final phase of the Indian removal plan was the removal of the Cherokees. The Indian Removal Act was a law passed by Congress during Andrew Jackson presidency on May 28, 1830.


Which trail was caused by the Indian removal act?

The trail that was caused by the Indian removal act was the Trail of Tears.


What was the law that allowed native Americans to be removed from their lands?

The Indian Removal Act


Was the Indian removal was fair?

no