0
Both are equally important. Inductive reasoning is when one makes a conclusion based on patterns; deductive reasoning is based on a hypothesis already believed to be true. However, deductive reasoning does give a more "solid" conclusion because as long as the hypothesis is true, the conclusion will most likely to be true. An example is saying that all dogs are big; Harry is a dog, so it must be big. Since the hypothesis all dogs are big is false, Harry may not necessarily be big. If I change my hypothesis to be all dogs are mammals, thus concluding that Harry is a mammal since it is a dog, I would be correct, for I changed my hypothesis to a true fact. Using inductive reasoning, on the other hand, may result in a false conclusion. For example, since I am a human and I have brown hair, one could use inductive reasoning to say all humans have brown hair, which would be false. So, to sum it up, both inductive and deductive reasoning are important, but deductive reasoning is usually more reliable since as long as the hypothesis one's conclusion is based on is true, the conclusion itself will usually be true.
Wiki User
∙ 8y ago
Wiki User
∙ 14y agoFresh fruits costs more in winter. this is January. These fresh strawberries cost more.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
An argument that starts from a more specific idea to reach a more general conclusion is known as?
inductive-reasoning
What is inductive and deductive reasoning?
Inductive reasoning moves from the general details to the specific details Deductive reasoning is reasoning from the specific details to the general details
Inductive reasoning and deductive reasoning?
Deductive reasoning is when researchers work from general information to more specific information. Inductive reasoning is when researchers work from specific observations to theories and generalizations.
What type of reasoning is used when a scientist tests a hypothesis?
That would be deductive reasoning, as this type of reasoning moves from a general premise (an hypothesis) to a more specific conclusion (theory).
Compare normative deductive and inductive approaches to theory formulation which approach is more useful in theory construction?
Inductive approach involves reasoning from particular to general. While the deductive theory is the method which makes reasoning from particular to general.
Compare normative deductive and inductive approaches to theory formulation which approach is more useful in theory construction-?
Inductive approach involves reasoning from particular to general. While the deductive theory is the method which makes reasoning from particular to general.
Does Sherlock Holmes use inductive reasoning?
Sherlock Holmes is described by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle as using logical deductive reasoning to solve his mysteries. Deductive reasoning arrives at a specific conclusion based on generalizations. Inductive reasoning takes events and makes generalizations. Holmes' methods are most often more accurately described as a form of inductive reasoning.
What is the difference between inductive an deductive method?
Inductive reasoning involves making general conclusions based on specific observations or evidence. Deductive reasoning starts with a general principle or hypothesis and applies it to specific cases to reach a conclusion. Inductive reasoning moves from specific to general, while deductive reasoning moves from general to specific.
What is more common inductive argument or deductive argument?
Inductive Argument
What is a conclusion reached through inductive reasoning?
Deductive reasoning goes from a general to a specific instance. For example, if we say all primes other than two are odd, deductive reasoning would let us say that 210000212343848212 is not prime. Here is a more "classic"example of deductive reasoning. All apples are fruits All fruits grow on trees Therefore, all apples grow on trees
What describes deductive reasoning?
deriving information from information that is already known and established. not a prediction 2nd answer: Deductive reasoning begins with general knowledge and leads to the specific. Inductive reason begins with various known facts and works toward the overall more general.
How do you formulate a deductive or inductive argument?
Deductive reasoning is reasoning that starts with general principles to form a conclusion about a specific case. To formulate a deductive argument, you should take a general idea or concept, like an ideology or commonly shared moral view and relate it to a more specific subject that links to your side of the argument. Inductive reasoning is the exact opposite; it involves developing a set of specific facts to create a general principle. To formulate an inductive argument, you should take a set of related facts and link them to an overarching moral or concept that supports your argument.
