Your question does not make sense.
Of course the Romans had food. Every single people in the world and throughout history has/had food. Without food you die.
The Romans invented concrete to build taller and more stable structures than ever built before. They invented the arch which can hold up a building with a single keystone.
There is no a single nation, region, town, village or unit of mankind that loves to be occupied and live under the instructions of invaders and the Romans did invade in the territory of Icenis
with pure will and power and in single combat but then they got over thrown couple hundred years later
Rich Romans lived in amazing houses poor Romans didn't. Rich Romans ate delectable food poor Romans didn't rich Romans had money poor ones didn't rich ones didn't work poor ones did but there is a difference between poor Romans and slaves were people who were very poor and were owned. and if you want to learn the difference between slaves and rich people or poor people and slaves i recommend going on to wikipedia it is a very advanced website that has about 20 A4 pages about every single precise subject.
Yes, the Romans had multiple floors. Private homes were either single story or the larger ones would have two floors. The apartment buildings had as many as six floors (no elevators). Some public buildigs had second stories also.
25000 roman soldiers and another 500 servants,cooks,drivers and workers were aboard a single roman warship
The date usually given is that of the destruction of the Temple in Jerusalem by the Romans in 70 CE, when they were suppressing a Jewish revolt against Roman rule.However, the Romans did not force the Jews out of Judea in a single expulsion. Rather, the Romans expelled them from Jerusalem only; and the rest of Judea lost its Jews slowly, over a period of centuries, as living there became too harsh.
The Romans called London "Londinium".The Romans called London "Londinium".The Romans called London "Londinium".The Romans called London "Londinium".The Romans called London "Londinium".The Romans called London "Londinium".The Romans called London "Londinium".The Romans called London "Londinium".The Romans called London "Londinium".
The Romans had kings for about 243 years.The Romans had kings for about 243 years.The Romans had kings for about 243 years.The Romans had kings for about 243 years.The Romans had kings for about 243 years.The Romans had kings for about 243 years.The Romans had kings for about 243 years.The Romans had kings for about 243 years.The Romans had kings for about 243 years.
The Romans called the Netherlands, Batavia.The Romans called the Netherlands, Batavia.The Romans called the Netherlands, Batavia.The Romans called the Netherlands, Batavia.The Romans called the Netherlands, Batavia.The Romans called the Netherlands, Batavia.The Romans called the Netherlands, Batavia.The Romans called the Netherlands, Batavia.The Romans called the Netherlands, Batavia.
No, and neither did the rich Romans. The Romans did not use butter, they used oil in its place.No, and neither did the rich Romans. The Romans did not use butter, they used oil in its place.No, and neither did the rich Romans. The Romans did not use butter, they used oil in its place.No, and neither did the rich Romans. The Romans did not use butter, they used oil in its place.No, and neither did the rich Romans. The Romans did not use butter, they used oil in its place.No, and neither did the rich Romans. The Romans did not use butter, they used oil in its place.No, and neither did the rich Romans. The Romans did not use butter, they used oil in its place.No, and neither did the rich Romans. The Romans did not use butter, they used oil in its place.No, and neither did the rich Romans. The Romans did not use butter, they used oil in its place.