Yes but it will have a remainder of 1
1, 3, 9, 27, 41, 123, 369, 1107.
By the multiples of 123 (which are infinite), including these: 123, 246, 369, 492, 615, 738, 861, 984, 1107 . . .
64% of 1,107= 64% * 1107= 0.64 * 1107= 708.48
90.9% of 1,107= 90.9% * 1107= 0.909 * 1107= 1,006.263
1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, 12, 18, 27, 36, 41, 54, 82, 108, 123, 164, 246, 369, 492, 738, 1107, 1476, 2214, 4428.
1107 + 200 = 1307
No, both are divisible by 2.No, both are divisible by 2.No, both are divisible by 2.No, both are divisible by 2.
351 is not divisible by 2. 2 is not divisible by 351.
2 is not divisible by 19008. 19008 is divisible by 2.
2 is not divisible by 972. 972 is divisible by 2.
2 is not divisible by 870. 870 is divisible by 2.
Of course not ! The answer is right within your question: 2 is divisible by 2 but 2 is not divisible by ... (can you dig it ?)