No
The rule of thumb is that if the sum of the digits of the number equals a number that is divisible by 3, then the number is divisible by 3.For example,372: 3+7+2 = 12, which is a multiple of 3 (3x4=12)So, 3 is a factor of 372(which is true, as 3 x 124 = 372).124: 1+2+4 = 7, which is not a multiple of 3So, 3 is not a factor of 124(which is true, as 124 is not evenly divisible by 3, 124/3 = 41.33333)
124 is divisible by 4
yes because 124 x3=372
124 / 9 = 13.777777778
Oh, dude, let me break it down for you. So, 124 isn't divisible by 3 because if you add up the digits (1 + 2 + 4 = 7), that sum isn't divisible by 3. And 124 isn't divisible by 6 either because it's not an even number. As for 9, nope, it doesn't work because the sum of the digits (1 + 2 + 4 = 7) isn't divisible by 9. So, in conclusion, 124 is just being a rebel and not playing nice with these numbers.
No.
120 and 124, among others.
Neither is divisible by 8.
Four of them.
no 120 = 8 x 15 128 = 8 x 16
None of these two numbers are divisible by 8.
Because the four is not 5 or 0 then this number is not divisible by 5.