no 7 is divisible by 14. :)
The smallest multiply of 7 divisible by 9 is the lowest common multiple of 7 and 9: lcm(7, 9) = 63.
No, because for a number to be divisisble by 9, it's digits (2,6 & 7) must add together to produce a number divisible by 9. 2+6+7=8+7=15. Is 15 divisible by 9? No, so we can conclude that 267 is not divisible by 9.
1, 2, 7, 3 and 6 are not divisible by 4 and/or 9. 12736 is divisible by 4 but not by 9.
No... In order for a number to be divisible by 9, the sum of its digits must ALSO be divisible by 9. In this case, 7+0+9+6 = 22. 22 is not divisible by 9 !
9
no 7 + 6 + 7 = 20 = 2 + 0 = 2 numbers divisible by 9 add up to 9 85.2222 = 767 / 9
The method to check divisibiity by '9' is the add the digits. If the addition sum to '9' , then the number is divisible by '9'. Hence. 998876 ; 9+9+8+8+7+6 = 47 ; 4 + 7 = 11 ; 1+ 1 = 2 Do NOT divisible by '9'.
3*21 = 63 so 63 is divisible by 3 7*9 = 63 so 63 is divisible by 7.
Just add up the digits and if that sum is divisible by 9 then the original number is divisible by 9. Example 729 = 7+2+9 = 18 (18 is divisible by 9 therefore 729 is divisible by 9) 123456789 = 1+2+3+4+5+6+7+8+9 = 45 (45 is divisible by 9 therefore 123456789 is divisible by 9)
No it is not. To find out:Add the digits in the number (ex.- 1+6+0=7)If 7 is divisible by 9 (it is not) then the whole original number is divisible by nine.Hope i helped!;)
To determine if 387,380 is divisible by 9, you can sum its digits: 3 + 8 + 7 + 3 + 8 + 0 = 29. Since 29 is not divisible by 9, 387,380 is not divisible by 9.
63