No, because Krishna is thought to have lived at least 1400 years before Jesus but commonly thought to have lived c3228 BC[E]. Scholars have noted many similarities between Krishna and Jesus here are a short list of the most common:
Both are heralded by a bright star
Both are born of a Virgin
Both are visited by three wise men bearing gifts
Both are the second of a trinity
Both were the way to god
Both perform miracles [curing a leper]
Both were crucified
Both were raised again
Some of the points are controversial and some are debatable however there are definitely indisputable similarities between the two. overall if anything jesus was a follower of krishna.
No, absolutely not. They are founders of two totally different religions. Krishna is a deity worshipped in Hinduism that has several manifestations. Jesus Christ was a real person who walked the earth around 4BC-30AD, and was regarded as divine by his followers because of his claims, his teaching and his miracles.
From a mythological standpoint, both figures are among the numerous mythological persons said to be born in late December, killed, and resurrected three days later. There are a great deal of these religious figures throughout history (including Horus from Egyptian mythology, or Baldr from the Norse) , and it is hypothesized by many scholars that in origin this is representative of the evening star, Astrology and nature based religions. (There are strong correlations between the three days of death and three days of absence when Venus is not seen and it goes on).
For some, this information is used in arguments that are anti-religious in nature, particularly anti-Christian. Others, particularly students of comparative mythology, embrace it as evidence of a common inner consciousness and purpose in Humanity. I feel confident Joseph Campbell probably felt this way. I myself (as a Hindu) was discouraged by this when I first learned of it, but I have since seen it from another point of view.
In any case I am not well versed on the subject, but there are I'm sure many books which talk about it.
To a take a different route, both figures are essential to their respective religions, and both are considered to be incarnations of God by their respective devotees. Both are also often depicted as infants and worshiped as such. I'm sure there are many other similarities, although there are key differences too.
Jesus Christ is irrelevant in Hinduism just as Krishna is irrelevant in Christianity.
The teachings of Jesus ARE Christ's message because he was Jesus Christ. Christ and Jesus are the same person.
No, according to the dictionary a serapes is a Mexican blanket quite different from Jesus the Christ
they are not all the same
No. Jesus=Christ. Zeus=Greek god.
Jesus is - the same as He's always been
jesus is the same is the songs name
Origin of the Name ChristmasChrist Mass. For Jesus Christ being born.Krishna Maas in Sanskrit meaning Lord Krishna's Month. Krishna says in Bhagavad Geeta that December (Margashirsha) is his favourite month.
It comes from the Greek 'Christos' meaning 'the anointed one' or 'the saviour'. Many people believe, in error, that 'Christ' is Jesus' 'surname' as in 'Jesus Christ'. However it is not his name but his title - just like Presedent Obama or Queen Elizabeth. So it is equally valid to call him Jesus Christ or Christ jesus - both mean the same thing: Jesus the anointed one, or Jesus the saviour.
Judas Iscariot was one of the original disciples of Jesus Christ, and the one who betrayed Him. He was not a blood brother of Jesus.
No.
That is a wonderful question, but the Bible does not use much punctuation, so in reality, speaking of the grammar, it is suppose to be written Jesus, Christ. not Jesus Christ. As many references in the KJV of the Bible, is Christ Jesus, written correctly Christ, Jesus, or Jesus, Christ. It is referring to Christ.