It depends, but 'shallow' (refering to the 'focus') earthquakes hit, usally, with a bigger force. This is because if the focus is closer to the surface of the earth (like in the Kobe earthquake) then the siesmic waves do not have as far to travel to reach the surface. But you can still have a deep focus with a big impact: if the siesmic waves are more powerful.
No. Size does not necessarily affect the magnitude of an earthquake. In fact, a deep earthquake will have less of an effect on the surface than a shallow earthquake of the same magnitude.
Typically, a shallow focus earthquake will cause more damage than a deep focus earthquake. Shallow focus implies the source of the earthquake is near to the surface, so the waves will lose lesser energy than the deep focus earthquake waves while travelling through the Earth. But it depends on other factors too such as local stratigraphy, and subsurface conditions.
Shallow earthquakes typically produce more considerable damage compared to deep earthquakes. This is because shallow earthquakes occur closer to the Earth's surface, where the seismic waves have less distance to travel before reaching populated areas, resulting in stronger shaking. In contrast, deep earthquakes are further beneath the surface, which generally reduces their intensity and potential for surface damage. Thus, shallow earthquakes are often more destructive, especially in urban areas.
peni5
shallow
That is quite shallow for an earthquake.
No. Size does not necessarily affect the magnitude of an earthquake. In fact, a deep earthquake will have less of an effect on the surface than a shallow earthquake of the same magnitude.
It hit in the shallow waters about 80 miles from the coast of Japan.
Typically, a shallow focus earthquake will cause more damage than a deep focus earthquake. Shallow focus implies the source of the earthquake is near to the surface, so the waves will lose lesser energy than the deep focus earthquake waves while travelling through the Earth. But it depends on other factors too such as local stratigraphy, and subsurface conditions.
The most recent damaging earthquake was very shallow - only about 10 km deep, and indeed I think that today they even had one as shallow as 1km. You may look the data up on geonet.org.nz
Shallow earthquakes typically produce more considerable damage compared to deep earthquakes. This is because shallow earthquakes occur closer to the Earth's surface, where the seismic waves have less distance to travel before reaching populated areas, resulting in stronger shaking. In contrast, deep earthquakes are further beneath the surface, which generally reduces their intensity and potential for surface damage. Thus, shallow earthquakes are often more destructive, especially in urban areas.
It can be shallow or deep.
Shallow
Both extremes can be challenging in different ways. Being too shallow may lead to superficial relationships and a lack of depth in understanding others, while being too deep can lead to overanalyzing situations and becoming overly sensitive. Finding a balance between the two is key to healthy social interactions.
The difference between a shallow and deep foundation is very simple. A shallow foundation is not very deep and a deep foundation is.
is river godavari shallow or deep
· 7.0 magnitude · 10714sq miles (country) · Energy released close to the surface as shallow earthquake · After shocks shook crumbled buildings increasing damage