Yes. While act of melting wax is a physical change, because you can remould it, the wax is actually what is primarily burned as fuel. You cannot unburn the wick nor the consumed wax. Remember, if it can be redone, it is probably physical and vice versa.
The wick of a candle is used to light it and is used as a medium for burning the wax. As the wax is heated, it is soaked into the burning wick. As the fire burns the wax on the wick, more melted wax is absorbed into by the wick. As the wax burns down, so does the wick.
A melting candle is a physical change A burning one is a chemical
Lighting fireworks is indeed a chemical change. The process of combustion is a chemical process and results in substances of different chemical identity than began with.
The answer is neither one of those. Lighting a candle itself is a chemical change, but it exhibits flammability, which is a chemical property
lightning is a chemical reaction
chemical
yes
Lighting A Match
It is a chemical change. The reaction is combustion
Chemical property
chemical change
The change were new material is produce is called chemical change.
lighting is a chemical change
Lighting a match is a chemical change.
yes lighting a match is a chemical change
It is a chemical change.
Mainly chemical (oxidation).
lighting a match from a matchbox is a chemical change.
Light is a form of energy, not a change. Light can be produced by both chemical changes (such as fire), and physical changes (such as very high velocity impacts).
Is the lighting of a bulb a reversible or an irreversible change
This is a little tricky. Striking a match is a physical act, but it does induce chemical changes. It depends on exactly what you mean by "lighting", ultimately. The end result is definitely a chemical change.
Lighting A Match
Because when the light is matched, it has a chemical reaction that makes unable to change back into it's original format.
The sulfur on the match catches fire from friction as it is struck on the matchbox.