No, there is no subject. Who arrived?
"Bob and Sara arrived exactly at their cut off time."
"They arrived exactly at their cut off time."
Arrived exactly at their cut off time is not a correct grammar.
Made it exactly at their cut off time is not a correct grammar.
" Just'in time".
651/2 of them. (Note: By the time you read this answer, it will be wrong. However, all is not lost. It will be correct again in exactly 'N' weeks from now, where 'N' is any integer.)
Sorry she left school at 7:45
The correct form is in an hour's time.
Arrived exactly at their cut off time is not correct grammar. It is a sentence fragment.A grammatically correct sentence would be, "They [or "The widgets we needed to complete the oscillating framizam" or whatever] arrived exactly at their cutoff [not cut off] time."
You should say "arrived exactly at" instead of "exactly arrived on" and include a subject for the verb. The rest is correct.
The sentence "I arrived exactly at their cut off time" is not correct grammar because of the wrong diction used.
No, the sentence is not grammatically correct. It should be: "It had been a long time since I had written to you."
Both are, but they mean different things. She arrived just in time to see her cat knocking her sculpture down from the mantle. He played drums in time with the guitar. I got to work on time today.
As time flies is grammatically correct.
no.
It is grammatically correct to say it is the time for someone and not it is the time of someone.
It can be, but not all the time.
yes
No, "Is she and you arrived at the airport on time" is not correct. It should be "Did she and you arrive at the airport on time?" or "Did she and you both arrive at the airport on time?" for proper subject-verb agreement.
No, I think the correct way is- Is this the first time you've seen it?