No, the plural form of chief is chiefs.
The plural of chief is 'chiefs.' However the plural of thief is 'thieves.'
The words ending in -ief can form normal plurals. In this case, it is chiefs.An example of the other form is thief, which becomes thieves.
The plural of chief is chiefs.Most other -ief nouns form normal plurals, too.chief- chiefsbelief - beliefsbrief (n) - briefsThe exception is thief, which has the plural thieves.
The plural form for of the noun chief-of-staff is chiefs-of-staff.
The plural of "chief executive" is "chief executives"
The plural of chief is 'chiefs.' However the plural of thief is 'thieves.'
Not in English
it is chieves, for examle goose, geese, tooth, teeth, leaf - leaves
The words ending in -ief can form normal plurals. In this case, it is chiefs.An example of the other form is thief, which becomes thieves.
"Chief" is a singular noun with its own unique plural form, which is "chiefs." It follows the standard rule for forming plurals in English, where most words simply add an "s" to show they are in plural form.
chieves are cooked in chips like grain waves
Plural of chief: Chiefs
The plural of "chief" is "chiefs" In the plural: "Who were their chiefs?"
The plural of chief is chiefs.
The plural form of chief justice is chief justices.
The plural for piano is pianos; chiefs is the plural of chief.
The plural of chief is chiefs and the plural of solo is solos (or soli in music)