It depends on your perspective. With any technological agricultural practice, there are both risks and benefits. Generally, the benefits outweigh the risks or else no one would be doing them.
With crop dusters, or ag. aircraft, one risk can be the potential for wind-borne drift of a hazardous material such as a pesticide or fertilizer. Another risk is the low-flying nature of the activity. These aircraft do occasionally crash, sometimes taking the life of its pilot. Is it worth it? Most of these pilots will respond with an enthusiastic "Yes!" because of their love for the job.
the chemicals in crop dusting can go into the water that you drink and ya...
Yes
Yes.
Yes, some opt to use helicopters for crop dusting.
The act of crop dusting itself has not led to pesticide resistance. Mismanagement of pesticide application is the root cause of pesticide resistance.
a con is con :) be happy
yes crop dusting is still used today. especially on big fields of crops to keep pests away. but did you know that the pesticides in the crop dusting is very dangerous for the humans as well? it can get into the water we drink and we can get poisoned. pesticides cause brain cancer, lung cancer and the list goes on. CROP DUSTING IS BAD!!!
A crop dusting plane typically holds between 400-800 gallons of liquid for spraying pesticides or fertilizer. The exact capacity can vary depending on the size and model of the plane.
15 to 25 dollars per acre.
Crop dusting is a colloquialism for the aerial application of pesticides on a growing crop. Most pesticides so applied are no longer a "dust" as such, due to the possibility of drift into non-target areas, but are usually liquid formulations of usually fungicides or insecticides. They can be applied by either small, powerful airplanes or by helicopter.
Delta Airlines.
Delta started as a crop dusting operation and became a passenger airline in late 1929.