answersLogoWhite

0

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

What evidence is always subject to each individual's data?

An individual's perception and interpretation of evidence is always subjective and can vary based on personal beliefs, biases, and experiences. This subjectivity can influence how the evidence is understood and the conclusions drawn from it.


What is individualization evidence?

Individual evidence is the material that can be related to a single source; individualization always involves a comparison


How long does a felony charge stay on your record in Virgina?

Unless there is evidence of innocence and the verdict is overturn where the charges are expunged, it will always be there.Unless there is evidence of innocence and the verdict is overturn where the charges are expunged, it will always be there.Unless there is evidence of innocence and the verdict is overturn where the charges are expunged, it will always be there.Unless there is evidence of innocence and the verdict is overturn where the charges are expunged, it will always be there.Unless there is evidence of innocence and the verdict is overturn where the charges are expunged, it will always be there.Unless there is evidence of innocence and the verdict is overturn where the charges are expunged, it will always be there.


What is the distinction between lethal and nonlethal contagion in the hot zone?

Lethal contagions can kill but do not always do so, while nonlethal ones are not generally considered fatal but can be in just the right circumstances.


What is the difference between an opinion and an argument?

An opinion, whether it is grounded in fact or completely unsupportable, is an idea that an individual or group holds to be true. An opinion does not necessarily have to be supportable or based on anything but one's own personal feelings, or what one has been taught.An argument is an assertion or claim that is supported with concrete, real-world evidence. Many people confuse or lump the two terms because they cannot recognize the difference between evidence and reasons. In this case, reasons are typically associated with 'feelings' or commonly accepted ideals, while evidence is associated with measurable, objective truths or realities. While arguments may not always be ''right'' or true, they must at least be supported by some kind of external evidence.Many people are unable to distinguish the difference between reasons and evidence because their own personal bias clouds the distinction between the subjective and the objective.


What is the difference between 'in general' and 'by and large'?

The distinction is has almost disappeared, but there is a difference. "In general" means "true under most circumstances", while "by and large" means "both into the wind and away from it", and by extension "always true."


How does the relationship between a government and an individual differ when comparing Hitler's Germany and western democracies?

The relationship between a government and an individual differs greatly when comparing Hitler's Germany and Western democracies. In Hitler's Germany, the individual did not have any say in government. Conversely, in Western democracies, the individual always has a say in government via their ability to vote.


Unfairly places the onus of providing evidence for a position on the wrong side of an issue?

A rhetorical device that unfairly places the onus of providing evidence on the side which is not making a contention is called burden of proof. The burden of proof always lies with the individual who is attempting to prove a claim.


What are the cheats of Dragon Ball Z shin budokai?

the evidence is always under the sofa cushion the evidence is always under the sofa cushion


Use the word individual in a sentence?

I always work individual


Who first made the distinction between the sacred and the profane?

Mankind has distinguished between the sacred and the profane as long as they have believed in gods. There have always been areas that were taboo (forbidden) because they were cursed or because they were too holy, certain things that can't be done or said out of respect to the spirits or gods... there's no way of identifying one person, or even group of people, who are responsible for formulating the first distinction.


Are genetic mutations always harmful to the individual?

Genetic mutations are not always harmful to the individual. A few may be beneficial.