No, fire is not considered an object in the traditional sense because it is a process or reaction that involves the rapid combination of oxygen with a fuel source, producing heat and light.
Yes, fire does not have weight because it is a form of energy and not a physical object with mass.
Yes, fire does not have mass because it is a form of energy rather than a physical object.
Yes, fire can have a shadow. The shadow is created when the light from the fire is blocked by an object, causing a darker area to form behind it.
Fire requires three things: heat, fuel, and oxygen. If you take one of them away, then the fire will stop. By wrapping a heavy blanket around a burning object, it blocks oxygen in the air from getting to the fire and the fire goes out.
Fire does not have a shadow because it emits light and heat, which prevents a shadow from forming. Shadows are created when an object blocks light, but fire itself is a source of light and does not block it.
Heat, smoke, and the consumption or change of the fire's object.
no it is not
Spray gasoline on an object and light the object with the lighter.
[object Object]
set it on fire
No. "Prometheus" is the subject, "stole" is the transitive verb, "fire" is the direct object, and "from the Olympians" is a prepositional phrase with "from" as the preposition and "Olympians" as the object of the preposition.
Well, actually, yes it can because an imflammable object can still catch on fire just about anything can catch on fire cept for metall... eeek lucky to be metal ...
If a person sets a fire in the street to an object he/she is an arsonist.
It means that the object is liable to catch fire
Yes, fire does not have weight because it is a form of energy and not a physical object with mass.
Just water, because, water is the only thing that can put out the fire.
Yes, fire does not have mass because it is a form of energy rather than a physical object.