No. Fireworks are an example of a chemical change called combustion.
Yes, fireworks involve a chemical reaction where the materials inside the firework combine to produce light, heat, and sound. This chemical reaction is not reversible, so it is considered a chemical change rather than a physical change.
No, because chemical reactions are involved.
No, burning or combustion is a chemical change.
nope they have a chemical change
No it is a chemical change
No, chemical.
Exploding fireworks is the result of chemical reactions.
Explosions are a form of either combustion or decomposition (or both) reactions, and they are chemical changes.
Chemical
It is a physical change.
It's a physical change why are some people f$#@%ing stupid and saying a chemical change??
Are fireworks a chemical change or a physical change? Fireworks are a chemical change because once you lite it, it reacts to the fire.eat dodo doodadsdodo doodads
Fireworks involve both physical and chemical changes. The lighting of the firework (ignition) is a chemical change that triggers a series of reactions which results in the colorful display seen (physical change) as different elements are heated and produce light.
The blast of firecrackers is an illustration of substance change. During a compound change, substances are changed into various substances.
I guess it is a chemical change as the exploded fireworks cant be regained back which is possible in a physical change and not in a chemical change.
chemical
It is a chemical change.
chemical change
chemical
A physical change stays the same like tearing paper A chemical change makes the substance something new like fireworks explode (fireworks change to explosion)
A physical change stays the same like tearing paper A chemical change makes the substance something new like fireworks explode (fireworks change to explosion)
Exploding fireworks is the result of chemical reactions.
Explosiveness (not oxploziveness!) is a property, not a change. But it is a chemical property.