The past tense of the verb drink is either drank or drunk. Many people prefer the past tense drank, but drunk is also correct (just unpopular). The word drunk is also a noun, an inebriated person.
This example, however, calls for the present perfect tense, because it uses the auxiliary verb "has". The present perfect tense and past perfect tenses call for the past participle form of "drink", and that is "drunk". It is therefore correct to say "has drunk" and "had drunk",
No, "has drunk" is grammatically correct. It is the past participle form of the verb "drink" used with the auxiliary verb "has" to form the present perfect tense.
The phrase "You are not knowing" is not grammatically correct. Instead, you can use "You do not know" or "You are not aware."
Yes, "He sailed his boat on the river" is grammatically correct.
The phrase "Is you don't miss me do you" is not grammatically correct. It should be rephrased to something like "Don't you miss me?" to be correct.
No, it is not grammatically correct. The correct way to say it is "your older sister."
No, the grammatically correct sentence would be: "I am annoyed by the way you behave."
Not even close.
"Not like that" can be grammatically correct, depending on the context.
The phrase "Is you don't miss me do you" is not grammatically correct. It should be rephrased to something like "Don't you miss me?" to be correct.
Yes! That is grammatically correct!
Yes, 'for free', is grammatically correct.
The phrase "You are not knowing" is not grammatically correct. Instead, you can use "You do not know" or "You are not aware."
Yes, Almighty God is grammatically correct.
"That was wrong" is a grammatically correct sentence.
Yes, it is grammatically correct.
The sentence "Rhoda's Crazy" is not grammatically correct. It is missing a verb to make a complete sentence.
'What a drunkard you are' is a grammatically correct English sentence.
"For free' is grammatically correct. It is an idiom of the English language.