Occasionally, it's OK. Usually seen this way in quoted conversation and in the press by careless writers who often misuse and misspell words.
More careful writing normally avoids this casualness by dropping the connecting word, ending the first clause with a period, forming a resulting sentence.
Then starting a new sentence for the second idea.
The formal use gives the reader a better impression of the writer.
The sentence "Rhoda's Crazy" is not grammatically correct. It is missing a verb to make a complete sentence.
Yes, the sentence is grammatically correct.
LeastDuck, as you are a grrreat fan of deleting other people´s answer, try your own medicine. Like it, Ducky?
Yes. A grammatically correct sentence (to begin with) has to have a subject (int this case, hand) and a verb (is). The sentence does need to be capitalized and punctuated correctly though...
No, it is not. The "question word," why, should be at the beginning of the sentence. Why was she promoted?
it IS physically possible, but not grammatically correct.
yes
Yes, but it would not be grammatically correct.
"That was wrong" is a grammatically correct sentence.
Yes, as in: "Will it snow in December?"
This sentence is not grammatically correct. For the sentence to be grammatically correct, the space between "in" and "to" would have to be removed. Therefore the sentence should read "They are into skating."
The sentence is grammatically correct.
The sentence "Rhoda's Crazy" is not grammatically correct. It is missing a verb to make a complete sentence.
'What a drunkard you are' is a grammatically correct English sentence.
Yes, it is grammatically correct.
It certainly can be: Well phrased ideas are appealing.
That sentence is grammatically correct.