No, it is not true. A scientist can use many methods at the same time to investigate. The important thing is to eventually discard what doesn't work, and to refine what appears to work, or which can be 'proven' to work. Basically, it is all in being able to prove that the results actually work as expected, and that the results can be confirmed time after time when the experiments are repeated.
Wiki User
∙ 6y agoThis is true because if any bias is present, the outcome may be affected by the scientist's method.
True.
False
A. True
False
False. But it would be true if you had said the last 3 or 4 HUNDRED years.
Never. The scientific method precludes this. One can only say that an Idea has not yet been superseded by a better one.
This is true because if any bias is present, the outcome may be affected by the scientist's method.
Harrison Schmitt
true
True
Yes, Niels Bohr did use the scientific method. However, the scientific method ultimately proved his hypothesis to be only partly true.
that is true
The method of doubt test in Philosophy is a process Descartes uses in order to test his epistemological exploration in his "first meditation" paper. He uses it to investigate the extent of his knowledge and its basis in reasons or experiences. If there is any doubt about a piece of knowledge in Descartes mind, he has to reject it as not true.
It is true but only as a method for the survival of the species.
True.
true