This question is not asking for a comparison between Delta Force and ST6. Both are U.S. units. It is asking about JTF2, which is a CANADIAN special forces team.
Is JTF2 (Joint Task Force 2) better than Delta Force ? Perhaps. Perhaps not. By its nature, JTF2 is a highly secretive commando unit. Very little is known about its members, or the operations they are involved in.
Formed in 1992, JTF2 was established to fight terrorism, and today, in Afghanistan, they are a highly secretive unit who shun publicity, refuse to be photographed, and will not talk to "outsiders", according to Toronto Sun author Peter Worthington (himself a former Canadian military officer).
As for the question of whether they are "better" than Delta Force.... Worthington answers it this way; "The trouble with our secretive commando force that proponents like to hint is as good as, or better than, Britain's SAS, or the U.S. Delta Force, Rangers, etc., is there is no way the public can ever know".
"Maybe they are ask good as their quiet publicity implies. Maybe not".
In other words, since JTF2 is a secretive unit, with little known about them, it is impossible to compare them to other special forces.
Nope. Delta Force is maybe the best on what is does and has been doing and still is. However, it is to be noted that ST6 was created by Richard Marcinko after a failed rescue mission of Delta Force in Operation Eagle Claw. This might imply that ST6 could be an "improved" version of the Delta Force in some respect. Also it has been a general knowledge that Delta Force was patterned after the British SAS but ST6 was unique and original American stuff.
It has been rumored that in terms of headcount, the ratio is somewhere between 1:2 or 1:3. That is, Delta Force operators is more than twice as many as ST6 operators. This could mean something as to the "selectiveness" of its members. Richard thought that Delta Force has grown too big and has become cumbersome, and so he made ST6 a sort of "leaner and meaner" in some sense.
Also, Delta Force is also known as "Combat Applications Group" while ST6 is known as "Development Group" which kind of imply that the former "applies" what the latter "develops". To sum it all up, Delta Force might be better in terms of experience as it has been in service for a long time and is based on a much older elite unit. On the other hand, ST6 could be better in terms of readiness for immediate deployment, flexibility and versatility (i.e. they best operate both on land and maritime missions), and innovations in terms of training, tactics and equipment.
I would say on land, Delta Force would have a slim advantage but on maritime ST6 has the advantage in a wider margin. Therefore, ST6 is probably the more complete or all-around unit.
It takes a lot more stress and force to break a weld than it does to pop a rivet.
railroads were better transportation than canals
Submarine Force
The Roman armies were able to defeat and conquer so many people because they were better equipped, better trained, and better disciplined. They were simply better than their enemies.The Roman armies were able to defeat and conquer so many people because they were better equipped, better trained, and better disciplined. They were simply better than their enemies.The Roman armies were able to defeat and conquer so many people because they were better equipped, better trained, and better disciplined. They were simply better than their enemies.The Roman armies were able to defeat and conquer so many people because they were better equipped, better trained, and better disciplined. They were simply better than their enemies.The Roman armies were able to defeat and conquer so many people because they were better equipped, better trained, and better disciplined. They were simply better than their enemies.The Roman armies were able to defeat and conquer so many people because they were better equipped, better trained, and better disciplined. They were simply better than their enemies.The Roman armies were able to defeat and conquer so many people because they were better equipped, better trained, and better disciplined. They were simply better than their enemies.The Roman armies were able to defeat and conquer so many people because they were better equipped, better trained, and better disciplined. They were simply better than their enemies.The Roman armies were able to defeat and conquer so many people because they were better equipped, better trained, and better disciplined. They were simply better than their enemies.
Yes because electrical force acts in all directions, whereas gravity is only directed downward.
It is not accurate or fair to say that one unit is "better" than the other. Both the US Army Delta Force and the British SAS are highly skilled and elite special forces units with different objectives and areas of expertise. They have undergone extensive training and have proven their capabilities in various missions around the world. Ultimately, the effectiveness of a unit depends on the specific situation, objectives, and the skills and experience of its individual operators.
Delta is a harder selection process but that's because it is a Tier 1 unit. The Navy seals have their own Tier 1 unit 'DEV GRU' who are as good as Delta. 'DevGru'` is the elite counter terrorism cadre of the NAVY and was responsible for the mission to kill osama bin laden.
The NAVY Seals definitely get paid more than the Delta Force. As the top black and special ops outfit in the Armed Forces, the Seals are simply considered the best of the best.
Yes it's way better
Delta Force Land Warrior was given a Metacritic score of 7.1, an 8.3 from Gamespy, and a 7.3 from IGN. The scores were lower than anticipated because all reviewers cited problems with the AI. Also, they said it was too easy to beat.
Delta Force and SEAL Team Six are both considered the elite of the elite, and one isn't known as being harder to get into than the other. SEAL Team Six is officially known as the United States Naval Special Warfare Development Group.
it is dragon ball rb is better. but force unleahed is cool/ awsome
Canada is very similar to the US, except: -There is more control on firearms -Communities are generally smaller That being said, most places within Canada are very safe. Depending on your destination, you might end up in areas that have unique risks or dangers to them. If you are camping outdoors, be aware that there are bears and other wild creatures within Canada. If you are walking down a dark alley in Vancouver, be aware that it's just as shady as a dark alley in Chicago.
they both have the same firepower
In a Y configuration, all AC system loads are connected at the same one point and are typically unbalanced. A neutral cable is used where the three phases meet. The delta configuration uses three phases that are connected in a triangle without a neutral cable. The delta configuration is better when you need high voltage transmissions.
Yes, and you can do even better than that.Weight IS the gravitational force on a mass.
I think mirror force because they would probably have more attack position monsters than defence.