Will modern warfare 3 be better than Battlefield 3?

Answer 1

Probably not an probably will, we havent heard alot about MW3, so I would put my money twords BF3, as it has a FULLY destructible enviroment, making it more realistic, but its takes like 20 minutes per match.

It really matters on how you view Video Games. If you really loved MW2 then you might want to get MW3. If you are looking for a new game to play BF3 will be excellent. The only thing that I see is worse in BF3 is it has 30 frames per second and MW3 has 60 frames per second, but that isn't a big deal. They also have different combat styles. In my opinion BF3 will be much better.

Answer 2

MW3 has a much better campaign but, Battlefield 3 has so much better graphics and the multiplayer on Battlefield 3! So if you were to get one of the 2 I would definetly suggest that you get Battlefield 3! Also IGN and Game Imformer both say that Batllefield 3 is much better than MW3 and give you so much more to do!

Answer 3

It depends what your looking for. Neither is officially better, but here are some facts:

MW3

• Maps similar size to that of MW2.
• Pretty well balanced, some people think there is an overpowered gun (type 95) in it.
• Quickscoping is in MW3.
• There are 2 bolt action rifles for quickscoping.
• MW3 has survival mode.
• MW3 has a pretty good campaign, much better than previous attempts.

Battlefield 3

• Has **HUGE** maps.
• Lots of weapons.
• New vehicles to use.
• Massively updated graphics.
• Very well balanced.
• Has no new game modes.
• Lots of people have said the campaign is very poor, not just CoD fans, and I agree.
• Has two seperate discs, one for campaign, one for multiplayer.

Note: They are similarly priced, and I have played both of these games lots and read lots of reviews to make sure I answer as well as I can.

Hope this helps.

Answer 4

Mw3 = faster action battlefield 3 is more tactical with vehicles and teamwork (if you have a good team...)

Answer 5

Definately modern Warfare 3.

Answer 6

no