Want this question answered?
1. Chronologically speaking, Beethoven was in the Classical Era. He was an important figure in both musical eras. His early influences were clearly Classical, having been taught (briefly) by Mozart and more so by Haydn. However, the rich, passionate nature of his music provided influence and a transition to the Romantic Era. 2. According to well-established chronologies in Western music, Beethoven (1770-1827) was mostly in the Classical era. However, the end date of the Classical era (and beginning date of the Romantic era) of 1820 is absolutely arbitrary. Beethoven composed in a Romantic style as early as 1803, when he finished his 3rd Symphony, "Eroica", which marked the dawn of the Romantic era.
Romantic. The answer given doesn't even begin to scratch the surface of the Symphony's complexity. It is both Classical and Romantic. It maintains some of the Classical disciplines that dictate how one may compose a symphony, but it also abandons some of these disciplines and pushes the boundaries greatly on the Classical Style and intent so that Beethoven is better able to express his innermost feelings.
1. The forms in movements 1, 2, and 4: the first movement is in sonata form, the second is a theme and variations, and the fourth is again in sonata form. The Symphony is clearly Romantic in style and has a Romantic theme. The form in the third movement is scherzo-trio, which is a Romantic innovation derived from the minuet-trio that is commonly associated with the Classical period. Also, there are sudden changes in tempo and mood within each movement. I would not call this a Classical symphony. It sounds too far different than one by Haydn or Mozart.
the difference is that a romantic poem will be about love towards people while classical will be more old fashioned and be about other things!!! romantic poems are more towards people in love and great to be read whilst in deep love with another person. idiot... do not listen to that at all.... The romantic era was not about love at all. In fact it had nothing to do with romance of the conventional kind. It was imaginative and more related to democracy and nature than anything else. Had relations to human life, and was highly philosophical. It was most definitely not about love. The Classical age on the other hand was the complete opposite to the romantic age in some respects. It had no real interest in nature as it exists naturally. Satire and realism was present, as well as a strong union with politics. It was highly critical, unimaginative and intellectual as opposed to the spontaneity of the romantic age.
Unlike the dynamics of the early baroque, Classical music dynamics tended to be a little more diverse, yet without the passion of the Romantic era. There was the range, from the pianissimo to the fortissimo but music of the early Classical era lacked the dramatic and sudden changes characteristic of later Classical composers such as Beethoven, who led into the Romantic.
it is a program symphony - follows a storyline has more chromatic notes than it would if it was classical phrases are longer emotional
Berlioz wrote during the Romantic period and his music conforms to the norms of romantic music rather than classical. However, if you mean classical music as opposed to pop, the answer is yes.
The difference between classical ballet and romantic ballet is that romantic ballet was created in the 19th century, whereas Classical ballet was created in the 17th century. In the 18th century, women played secondary roles as dancers. They wore corsets, wigs, high heels, and hoops. Also, the difference was the music and the way they danced. In classical there were less men than in romantic ballet. Romantic= Interests in men, nature, higher powers, past, and other places. Free expressive and emotional. Classical= All the opposite of romantic
It depends if you're into classy jazz then maybe so
1. Chronologically speaking, Beethoven was in the Classical Era. He was an important figure in both musical eras. His early influences were clearly Classical, having been taught (briefly) by Mozart and more so by Haydn. However, the rich, passionate nature of his music provided influence and a transition to the Romantic Era. 2. According to well-established chronologies in Western music, Beethoven (1770-1827) was mostly in the Classical era. However, the end date of the Classical era (and beginning date of the Romantic era) of 1820 is absolutely arbitrary. Beethoven composed in a Romantic style as early as 1803, when he finished his 3rd Symphony, "Eroica", which marked the dawn of the Romantic era.
Romantic. The answer given doesn't even begin to scratch the surface of the Symphony's complexity. It is both Classical and Romantic. It maintains some of the Classical disciplines that dictate how one may compose a symphony, but it also abandons some of these disciplines and pushes the boundaries greatly on the Classical Style and intent so that Beethoven is better able to express his innermost feelings.
1. The forms in movements 1, 2, and 4: the first movement is in sonata form, the second is a theme and variations, and the fourth is again in sonata form. The Symphony is clearly Romantic in style and has a Romantic theme. The form in the third movement is scherzo-trio, which is a Romantic innovation derived from the minuet-trio that is commonly associated with the Classical period. Also, there are sudden changes in tempo and mood within each movement. I would not call this a Classical symphony. It sounds too far different than one by Haydn or Mozart.
In the new wave of change that came with the Romantic Movement was that writers, artist, and poets talk about feelings emotions and peace and tranquility. Rather than then in the classical way of reason.
the difference is that a romantic poem will be about love towards people while classical will be more old fashioned and be about other things!!! romantic poems are more towards people in love and great to be read whilst in deep love with another person. idiot... do not listen to that at all.... The romantic era was not about love at all. In fact it had nothing to do with romance of the conventional kind. It was imaginative and more related to democracy and nature than anything else. Had relations to human life, and was highly philosophical. It was most definitely not about love. The Classical age on the other hand was the complete opposite to the romantic age in some respects. It had no real interest in nature as it exists naturally. Satire and realism was present, as well as a strong union with politics. It was highly critical, unimaginative and intellectual as opposed to the spontaneity of the romantic age.
Unlike the dynamics of the early baroque, Classical music dynamics tended to be a little more diverse, yet without the passion of the Romantic era. There was the range, from the pianissimo to the fortissimo but music of the early Classical era lacked the dramatic and sudden changes characteristic of later Classical composers such as Beethoven, who led into the Romantic.
During the nineteenth century, English poetry was dominated by the Romantic Movement, or Romanticism. Romantic poetry was different from the more classical approach to poetry. The Romantic poets focused on emotional and imaginative experiences rather than intellectual ones. They used "everyday" language and topics. They showed how the lives of common people were extraordinary. Shelley was one of England's greatest Romantic poets.
The ability to be romantic is down to personality, not gender. Both are equally romantic.