Yes. Julius Caesar was a real man and he really was murdered by a group of people on March 15. One of his murderers was his friend and protege Brutus.
Your question is ambiguous. Shakespeare's play Julius Caesar was written in 1599; it's an Elizabethan play. The events in the play are based on historical events in the first century BCE, which you might call the Classical or Roman Era.
Shakespeare does not specify the date on which this or any other of his plays take place. However, the events depicted are based on historical events. The Battle of Munda, Caesar's victory over Pompey discussed in the first scene, took place in 45 BCE. Caesar was assassinated on March 15, 44 BCE. The Battle of Philippi (there were actually two battles, but Shakespeare has conflated them into one) took place in October of 42, two and a half years later.
The historical tragedies such as Julius Caesar, Macbeth, etc were adapted from historical events and the then popular Hollingshead"s Chronicles- this is not the people who make lighter fluid, briquettes, etc.
Yes. Remember, Shakespeare is not a historian, he is/was a playwright. Even though he used genuine historical writings for his research, he still had to create dialog an even some events in order to produce a good play.
Cassius compares it to Caesar
William Shakespeare based his play Julius Caesar on Sir Thomas North's translation of Plutarch's Life of Brutus and Life of Caesar. Plutarch's biographies of important Romans were popular in Shakespeare's days.
Your question is ambiguous. Shakespeare's play Julius Caesar was written in 1599; it's an Elizabethan play. The events in the play are based on historical events in the first century BCE, which you might call the Classical or Roman Era.
because the people liked violence and the fat he conquered others.
Casca was a Roman senator and a conspirator in the plot to assassinate Julius Caesar. He played a key role in the assassination by being one of the first to stab Caesar, which ultimately led to Caesar's downfall. Casca's actions were pivotal in the events that unfolded in Shakespeare's play "Julius Caesar."
Shakespeare does not specify the date on which this or any other of his plays take place. However, the events depicted are based on historical events. The Battle of Munda, Caesar's victory over Pompey discussed in the first scene, took place in 45 BCE. Caesar was assassinated on March 15, 44 BCE. The Battle of Philippi (there were actually two battles, but Shakespeare has conflated them into one) took place in October of 42, two and a half years later.
The historical tragedies such as Julius Caesar, Macbeth, etc were adapted from historical events and the then popular Hollingshead"s Chronicles- this is not the people who make lighter fluid, briquettes, etc.
In Act 3, Scene 2 of Shakespeare's "Julius Caesar," both Cassius and Brutus leave the scene after their confrontation. The argument strains their friendship and sets in motion the events leading to Caesar's assassination.
Romeo and Juliet is a work of fiction, the source of which was the imagination of the author, William Shakespeare. While Shakespeare was undoubtedly influenced by many earlier works of fiction as well as many actual historical events, there is no specific source for this play other than Shakespeare's imagination.
Yes. Remember, Shakespeare is not a historian, he is/was a playwright. Even though he used genuine historical writings for his research, he still had to create dialog an even some events in order to produce a good play.
Shakespeare's history plays were based on real events.
maybe
William Shakespeare made modifications to the actual events in history to suit the limitations of the stage. Stage was his living. Many events in history can not be acted as such on stage. Limitations of space on the stage and limitations of tastes of the paying spectators had to be considered. Moreover aesthetic beauty of the play to be acted on a stage also had to be accommodated. Most of his creations were once considered not as books to be read but plays to be acted on stage. But now, exactly as Thomas Hardy predicted in England, his plays have ceased to be acted on stage, and begun to be read and studied as literary creations. Shakespeare also did certainly wish for this, but in his times he could not restraint himself from the stage as it provided his daily bread. Whatever modifications have he made to actual events in history in each of his play is an elaborate subject of study which needs special attention.