It does hint at common ancestry so it is "evidence" of evolution.
No, they are not evidence for ontogeny recapitulating phylogeny.
By examining fossils and by determining their relative and absolute ages, scientists have collected evidence that supports the theory that species changed over time.
Fossils, Similarities in early development, and similar body structures
Fossils, patterns of early development, similar body structures, DNA, and protein structures.
Fossils. These show the incredible amount of time required to turn early life forms into stone. Studying the fossils, one can see the similarities and evolution of species over time. UNREST.
No, they are not evidence for ontogeny recapitulating phylogeny.
By examining fossils and by determining their relative and absolute ages, scientists have collected evidence that supports the theory that species changed over time.
Fossils, Similarities in early development, and similar body structures
stoned monkeys rule the world
Fossils, patterns of early development, similar body structures, DNA, and protein structures.
Fossils. These show the incredible amount of time required to turn early life forms into stone. Studying the fossils, one can see the similarities and evolution of species over time. UNREST.
ansector
ansector
this is because they have a link with early ancestors of similar structure.
Embryo
Early and mid-1800s
The systematic recording and development of collections of archaeological evidence began in the early 19th century with the emergence of modern archaeology as a discipline. This period saw the establishment of professional standards for excavation, documentation, and preservation of artifacts and sites. Archaeologists such as Sir Mortimer Wheeler and Sir Flinders Petrie were instrumental in shaping these practices.