Want this question answered?
You don't. Quit the reductio ad absurdum and do both.
It is a phrase, not a term. The phrase is reductio ad absurdum.
It is a phrase, not a term. The phrase is reductio ad absurdum.
I do believe that the difference is as follows: Reductio ad Absurdum is a valid argument in which you prove or disprove something by following logical conclusions until you find an absurd statement. Ex. Father: Why did you start smoking? Daughter: All my friends were doing it. Father: You're saying that if all your friends jumped off a cliff, you would do that too? The father uses reductio ad absurdum by following the logical conclusion that the daughter will do anything her friends do, the result of this is of course absurd. Reductio ad ridiculum however, is NOT a valid for of argument and just makes you sound uneducated if you use it. It is taking a statement to an extreme, however correct level as an attempt to discredit it, this however is unfair and does not actually challenge the argument. EX Borrowed from Wikipedia If Einsteins theory of relativity were true then when I drive my car it would get more massive, now come on that's ridiculous! (This of course is true, although humans can't detect it)
Proof by contradiction is also known by its Latin equivalent, reductio ad absurdum.
Taking an opponent's argument to its illogical conclusion, also known as reductio ad absurdum, involves extending their argument to an extreme or absurd scenario to highlight its flaws or logical inconsistencies. This technique aims to demonstrate that following the opponent's argument leads to unreasonable or nonsensical outcomes.
Mom: "Why did you drink alcohol when you know you're not of age?" Son: "All of my friends were doing it." Mom: "So, if all of your friends jumped off a bridge, you would too?"
The Latin phrase is "reductio ad absurdum", meaning reduction to absurdity. You assume the opposite and show that logically it leads to a contradiction and therefore cannot be true.
The Latin phrase is "reductio ad absurdum", meaning reduction to absurdity. You assume the opposite and show that logically it leads to a contradiction and therefore cannot be true.
Begging the questionScandalous
Proof by contradiction (APEX)
Some terms in logic are:axiom - something that is self-evident.deductive reasoning - the truth of the premises assures the truth of the conclusion, and the falsity of it is impossible.inductive reasoning - the premises support the conclusion, but do not necessitate it.fallacy - an argument that is based on an invialid or false inference.symbolic logic - representing expressions through the use of symbols and variable, rather than in ordinary language.contingency - a statement that might be true or false