The rich and powerful dislike Communism, as a classless society would mean the end of their privileges.
Karl Marx believed in the idea of communism, where the working class would rise up against the capitalist system to create a classless society where resources are shared equally among all individuals. Marx also emphasized the importance of understanding the economic relations and class struggles in society.
In short, no. Classless society, in it's ultimate version would mean no divisions on the basis of economic status, which certainly wasn't the case in the USSR.
Karl Marx believed that under communism, where workers held power collectively rather than being governed by a separate entity, the need for a centralized government would diminish and eventually disappear as society became truly classless and stateless. This idea is tied to his vision of a society where working classes would no longer be exploited and oppressed, leading to a harmonious and egalitarian society.
According to Marx, the proletariat would revolt against and overthrow the owners of the means of production , i.e. the bourgeoisie. The victory of the proletariat would mean that, for the first time in history, one group of people would not be oppressing an other. This new society would be called Communism. The new society would indirectly transition to Communism via a socialist stage, where class distinctions remained in existence and power while the means of the production, being socialised, would break down the existing social distinctions in society.
Karl Marx meant that ideas, beliefs, and values in society are shaped by the material conditions and social relations of that society. He believed that dominant ideas reflect the interests of the ruling class, serving to maintain the status quo and perpetuate inequality. Marx argued that ideas are not fixed or inherent but are products of the historical and social context in which they are developed.
perhaps because of corrupt leaders who have turned into dictators?
Marx believed that the status of women in society reflected its level of advancement. He argued that as societies progressed towards equality for women, they also advanced in terms of overall social development. In other words, the treatment of women could be used as a gauge for measuring a society's progress.
Communism (a classless stateless society based on production for use) has never existed or come close to existing. So the answer to your poorly-expressed question is No.
The 'bourgeoisie' are the owners and controllers of the means of production according to Karl Marx.
Communism is a socio-economic system where the means of production are owned and controlled by the community as a whole, rather than by individual owners. It aims for a classless society where resources are distributed based on need, not profit.
Communism is a political theory advocating class war and leading society that all property is publicly owned and that each person works and will be paid according to their abilities and needs.