from 5.02 in steps of 0.01 up to 5.09...
You are probably looking for 1.6, but if you count ALL of the decimals between 1.5 and 1.7, then there is an infinite number of decimals between the two with an infinite number of decimal places.
501
there are infinite numbers between these decimals. you could have .51 .511 .5111 .51111 .51928471289347 .5918237498 .59283759823758923 as long as you keep making the number greater. all these numbers are decimals between. 0.5 and 0.6
51,52,53,54,56,57,58,59 There are an infinite number of them if you count decimals. 1.51, 1.52, 1.53, etc
I think you asking what is 1 + 2 + .. 499 + 500. There is a simple way to compute such sums-- Find the average of the numbers and multiply by the number of items in the list. Further the average is just the sum of the first plus the last number in the list, since all of the numbers differs by the same amount. So, the average is (1+500)/2 and there are 500 number is the list, so the sum is (501/2)* 500 = 250*501. [I use * to mean multiply.}
501, 502, 503 etc. There are 3499 of them and I have no desire to list them all.
501 is divisible by these numbers: 1, 3, 167, 501.
You are probably looking for 1.6, but if you count ALL of the decimals between 1.5 and 1.7, then there is an infinite number of decimals between the two with an infinite number of decimal places.
-1000
Exactly the same way you do when they're all whole numbers, or there are more than three numbers, or they're a mixture of whole numbers and decimals: -- Add up all the numbers on the list. -- Divide the big sum by the number of items on the list.
they all can be used to find the answer to the same wole number
501
List all the intermolecular forces between solutes2) List all the forces between solvents3) List all the intermolecular forces between solvent and solute4) State the energy comparisons.
There are 499 of them and I do not have the time nor inclination to list them. Start at 501, and keep adding 1 until you get to 999. Then stop.
All terminating decimals can be written as fractions.
No, they are not. Recurring decimals are rational.
It wold be nothing, or if you want to be legit it would be 0.1,0.2,0.3,etc and all the decimals