answersLogoWhite

0

It means that a similar case, or cases, containing similar circumstances has been decided previously and the judge can consider this previous decision (i.e.- (precedent) in coming to his decision.

User Avatar

Wiki User

7y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

What are the importance of precedents cases?

Precedents cases a case previously decided that serves as a legal guide for the resolution of subsequent cases.


What law is based on operating through the use of individual cases as precedents for future decisions?

Case law is based on the precedents and and legal principles applied by other courts in previous cases.


Are precedents the final decisions?

Precedents are the decisions in cases in the PAST. These past cases are used and applied to cases in the courts to provide certainty and consistency in the system of law and justice (no matter what legal system this is regarding).


What are the importance of casing?

Precedents cases a case previously decided that serves as a legal guide for the resolution of subsequent cases.


What is the legal term used to not overturn precedent?

The doctrine of stare decisis (Latin: Let the decision stand) encourages courts to adhere to established precedents when deciding cases.


What cases are bound by a decision of a state appeals court?

Decisions made by a state appeals court are binding on lower courts within the same state, meaning that trial courts must follow the legal principles established by the appeals court. Additionally, the decisions are typically binding on subsequent cases involving similar facts and legal issues within that jurisdiction. However, these decisions do not bind other state appeals courts or federal courts, as they operate under different jurisdictions and legal precedents.


What are the differences between legal writing and non legal writing?

Legal writing is used to determine precedents, to set peremiters and legalize determining factors...


Is the principle of stare decisis irrelevant to the hierarchy of courts making decisions?

No, the principle of stare decisis, which means to stand by things decided, is relevant in the hierarchy of courts. Lower courts are usually bound to follow the legal precedents set by higher courts within their jurisdiction. This helps ensure consistency and predictability in the law.


What determines questions of law?

Questions of law are determined by statutes, legal precedents, and constitutional provisions. They involve the interpretation of legal principles and rules, rather than the facts of a case. Courts, particularly appellate courts, typically address questions of law to ensure consistent application of the law across cases. Ultimately, the resolution of these questions shapes legal standards and guides future judicial decisions.


Why do state judges follow precedents of federal laws?

Because in United States courts (federal) and most state courts (except Louisiana) we follow a common western legal system known as "Common Law" with bases itself on previous standing interpretations of a law (aka precedent)


What important function serves the supreme court in the US federal government?

It has original jurisdiction over, and therefore the power to resolve, disputes between states. -Apex


Do judges use precedents when deciding a case in a common law legal system?

yes