Great question!
One way to approach the question is to determine which Pauline letters were included in The Bible as we know it today, and which ones were not, from an historical perspective.
Noted Reformed scholar J. N. D. Kelly indicates that "The first official document which prescribes the twenty-seven books of our New Testament as alone canonical is Athanasius's Easter Letter for the year 367, but the process [of establishing the canon] was not everywhere complete until at least a century and a half later." (Kelly 1978, p. 60)
As Kelly points out, the development of the canon was a gradual process. Based on St. Athanasius' 367 A.D. listing of the NT canon, earlier writings such as
were likely considered as not having apostolic authority behind them; i.e. Unless a book could be shown to come from the pen of an apostle, or at least to have the authority of an apostle behind it, it was peremptorily rejected, however edifying or popular with the faithful it might be. (Kelly 1978, p. 60)
The process, as Kelly points out, of ruling out other texts such as
would be completed later in synods and councils.
For example, in 382 Pope Damasus convoked a synod of bishops which identified a list of scriptural books identical to the Council of Trent's (1545-1563) formally defined canon. In 393 the Council of Hippo reiterated the list, as did the First Council of Carthage four years later. The list was given again in 419 at the Second Council of Carthage. (cf. Counting the Canon, by Steven L. Kellmeyer, Catholic Answers Website)
Thus, whether one goes by St. Athanasius' 367 A.D. count, Pope Damasus' 382 A.D. count, the Council of Catharge's 393 A.D. count, the Fist Council of Carthage's 397 A.D. count, the Second Council of Carthage's 419 A.D. count, or the Council of Trent's 1545-1563 A.D. count, one has the following 14 letters in the Pauline corpus:
REFERENCES
Kelly, J. Early Christian Doctrines, (San Francisco, CA: HarperSanFrancisco, 1978.)
Confraternity of Christian Doctrine. The New American Bible, (Iowa Falls: IA, World Bible Publishers, Inc. 1991).
It is false.
False.
False.
false
This is pretty advanced. Subtract "n" from the equation. You get 8=2. That is wrong. So now we have to make up numbers, called imaginary numbers. Otherwise known as letters. Now, since 8 doesn't equal 2,it is false. False starts with F. That is your answer. Math can be hard, but stick to it.
It is false.
False. Irrational numbers are real numbers.
False
False.
False.
False.
False
false
It is false. It does not include negative fractional numbers.
False.
False
false