You can conclude many things, but you have to make some assumptions. The conclusion you could make from this limited amount of data is that the two objects are falling, since objects fall at the same rate.
You could conclude that object a has less kinetic energy than object b. - Object b has a greater inertia than object A
What would be the density of an object that has a volume of 25 cm3 and 5 grams?
The weight of an object is measured in Newtons and not grams, so there cannot be such an object. The question is like asking what object weights more than 500 metres!
A stack of nine dimes weighs 20.4 grams.
You use grams to find the mass of an object.
You could conclude that object a has less kinetic energy than object b. - Object b has a greater inertia than object A
The object's kinetic energy is 2,500 joules.
Kinetic energy = 1/2mv2, where kinetic energy is measured in Joules, mass in grams, and velocity in m/s.
No object does since weight is not measured in grams but in Newtons. Grams are used for measuring mass, not weight.
No. Grams are for weight.
Example: The density of an object is 100 grams/cm3. The weight of an object is 50 grams. What is the volume of the object?
That is 170 grams
It depends on the volume of the object.
What would be the density of an object that has a volume of 25 cm3 and 5 grams?
Mass or grams
an apple
30/10 = 3.0 grams per cc