There is no "opposite" of mammals, only different life forms, such as reptiles (cold-blooded, egg-laying) or insects (very dissimilar) or bacteria (not multicellular).
Mammal is a classification, within a group of many other classifications, with their own distinct characteristics. Some major characteristics like being warmblooded or being a vertebrate could be the reverse, but the animals would still share many characteristics. Therefore there is no opposite to the term.
Egg laying animals are known as oviparous.
Mammal
A mammal which is not a marsupial or a monotreme is called a placental mammal. There is no opposite to a marsupial. An animal is either a marsupial or it is not. Marsupial is the term given to any mammal of the order Marsupialia whose young are born in an immature state and continue development in the "marsupium" (or pouch).
There isn't really an opposite. Some might claim a mammal is the opposite of a reptile, but this comparison breaks down when you look at their biology in detail. --------------------------------------------------- Yes applying the concept of an opposite to living things is a bit meaningless.
No, the term "reptile" does not have an opposite in the same way that some words have antonyms. "Reptile" is a specific classification for certain cold-blooded vertebrates, so there is no direct opposite term for it.
No, a Horse is a mammal.
* Land mammal: Moose * Marine mammal: Bowhead whale* Land mammal: Moose * Marine mammal: Bowhead whale* Land mammal: Moose * Marine mammal: Bowhead whale* Land mammal: Moose * Marine mammal: Bowhead whale* Land mammal: Moose * Marine mammal: Bowhead whale* Land mammal: Moose * Marine mammal: Bowhead whale
A leopard is a mammal.
Yes. It is a mammal.
yes it is a mammal
a bass is to fish as horse is to mammal
Whales and dolphins are Cetaceans..
none if a mammal doesnt have a spine then it is not a mammal