Want this question answered?
No. A real car IS not kinetic energy, but it HAS kinetic energy.No. A real car IS not kinetic energy, but it HAS kinetic energy.No. A real car IS not kinetic energy, but it HAS kinetic energy.No. A real car IS not kinetic energy, but it HAS kinetic energy.
An object with zero kinetic energy is at rest. However, since reference frames are relative, the calculation of kinetic energy is done with reference to an arbitrary point.
kinetic is not a potential energy because kinetic energy is made of movement but potential energies are stored but can be used
Yes and no. When the ball is at its highest point, it is storing potential energy. when it is moving back down, the potential energy turns into kinetic energy, and so forth. But when the ball is done bouncing, it doesn't technically "store" energy.
Yes, because it is not 100 % efficient at converting electrical energy into kinetic energy.
the Work-Energy Theorem states the work done is equal to the change in kinetic energy.
no, but the POTENTIAL energy may equal the work done to life the book to the shelf
no
false
No. A real car IS not kinetic energy, but it HAS kinetic energy.No. A real car IS not kinetic energy, but it HAS kinetic energy.No. A real car IS not kinetic energy, but it HAS kinetic energy.No. A real car IS not kinetic energy, but it HAS kinetic energy.
An object with zero kinetic energy is at rest. However, since reference frames are relative, the calculation of kinetic energy is done with reference to an arbitrary point.
kinetic is not a potential energy because kinetic energy is made of movement but potential energies are stored but can be used
That sounded plausible at first, but it's not true. The work you put into the objectis equal to the change in its total energy, but that could be in the form of kinetic,potential, chemical, any other form, or some of it going to each of several forms.
Yes, however it is very unlikely in day to day life. It could be done if the nessesary calcualtions are perfromed and an object is dropped from a precise height so that in a moment of time, its gravitational potential energy is equal to it's current kinetic energy. An even simpler way of making these energies equal is driving a car over a bridge of a known height and keeping the car at such a speed that its Ke is equal to it's GPe so that Ke=GPe
Yes and no. When the ball is at its highest point, it is storing potential energy. when it is moving back down, the potential energy turns into kinetic energy, and so forth. But when the ball is done bouncing, it doesn't technically "store" energy.
We assume you mean the work done in order to change the velocity of the moving mass.Easiest way is to calculate the change in the kinetic energy of the moving mass, and realizethat it's equal to the amount of work either put into the motion of the mass or taken out of it.Initial kinetic energy = 1/2 m Vi2Final kinetic energy = 1/2 m Vf2Change in kinetic energy = 1/2 m ( Vf2 - Vi2)
Yes, because it is not 100 % efficient at converting electrical energy into kinetic energy.