That depends on the law of the place. Many countries allow for people who are not police, such as security guards, to make what are usually called "citizen's arrests". The rules for them vary, depending on where you are. If the guard didn't follow the law for citizen's arrests, then perhaps he or she could be sued for false imprisonment and/or assault.
In the US, the only state not allowing citizens arrest is North Carolina. In NC, you can only "detain". With detaining, you are not authorized to move the person (take them to the police station) against their consent. You can only hold them there. But it is definitely legal to do so if you witness them commit a felony, disrupt the peace, destroy or steal property (and there may be other instances).
Can the person sue? Sure, you can sue for anything nowadays.
Would the security guard be well within there rights, just as a private citizen, if they witnessed the person shoplift? Absolutely (providing they are in the US). If, however, the customer did not shoplift, that's a whole different story.
Yes, the security guard can potentially be sued for detaining and handcuffing a customer if the actions were deemed excessive or unreasonable. The legality of the guard's actions would depend on the specific circumstances and the laws governing the use of force in that jurisdiction. If the guard used excessive force or violated the customer's rights, she may have grounds to file a lawsuit.
Absolutely. If a store security guard falsely detains someone causing damages to the person, the unlawfully detained person may certain seek civil action. This is why store security rarely detains someone without first seeing a crime taking place (concealing merchandise). Being wrong can be very costly to a business. More so, If Police are summoned and it's discovered that a person has done no wrong doing, the business can be subjected to penalties for false reporting.
amendment 5
There has to be probable cause to frisk. If the store suspects that you are shoplifting then they have probable cause for the action, so the answer is yes.
VAT
(Security Council) The Security Council can authorize action against an "outlaw" nation. If two-thirds of the fifteen members of the Security Council agree, it can authorize U.N. members to take military action. However, if any one of the five permanent members of the Security Council casts its veto, the Council cannot take action.
If a customer complains of poor pressure with their new shower and you cannot raise the CWSC what other action could you recommend?
you should call customer support
wearing a seatbelt in the car
internal security
Action control, Countermeasures, Counteranalysis
the P.A.T.R.I.O.t act
(Action by the Security Council is often blocked by the "great power" veto.)The U.N. Charter (constitution) gives each of the five permanent members of the Security Council the power to block Council action. This power is called the "great power" veto.During the Cold War years, the Soviet Union used its veto hundreds of times and thereby crippled the Security Council. For example, when in 1946 the Greek government asked the Security Council for help in its fight against communist rebels, the Soviet Union blocked this action. One of the few times the Security Council was able to take action was when it voted to stop North Korea's invasion of South Korea. The Soviet Union was not able to veto this action because it was boycotting the U.N. at the time.