Yes, it is. This is because there is a physical change. Being a liquid forming a solid. There is a chemical reaction when the hot water is added to the powder, forming a liquid, which is cooled, forming a solid
No,physical change
yes it is. It wouldn't be a chemical change because no new substance is form so, it's a physical.
it is a chemical change
It's a physical change.It's a chemical change. The concrete hardens through a chemical reaction called hydration :)Its a physical change. The Chemical change already happened when the water was added. The concrete powder became hydrated turning it into usable concrete.
Chemical broooooooooooooooo niga
No. A physical change is a change that does not change the chemical composition of a substance, while a chemical change does change the chemical composition of a substance.
It is a physical change.
It is a physical change.
yes!
It would be both. It's a physical change because it is changing state and a chemical change because water is being evaporated.
In specific, fireworks aren't really a chemical change -not if it is not being shoo-ted into the air! You see, when exploded into the air, heated is added on it so when it is in the air, it will eventually explode turning it into ashes
The formation of a new substance is the criterion for a chemical change. You can't have a chemical change without the formation of at least one new substance. As you can't observe a chemical property without setting a chemical change in motion, the answer to your question is yes.
yes it is. It wouldn't be a chemical change because no new substance is form so, it's a physical.
yes because it is exploding, falling and setting on fire so a change has happened alexandra holly middlehurst xoxo
yes because it changes the physical properties of it as a paper by burning
Burning is a chemical change.
chemical
It's a chemical change