I believe they shouldn't because guns don't kill people, people kill people. Guns are a utility that are used. Guns can be sold to almost anyone and can be used as i said before. Hope this helped you out! :)
they shouldn't. they cannot look into a crystal ball to see who will commit a gun crime and cannot know until after someone commits a crime that they are a criminal, at which point it is to late to stop them
Well sure they should pay the cost but i think they shouldn't sell to people unless they are proven by state or cop,and unless they are serving for military.
No. Making a gun manufacturer pay for the cost of gun violence is like saying a car manufacturer should pay for injuries any time a car is in a wreck, or saying that a knife manufacturer should pay for injuries anytime someone is stabbed.
Gun makers are not liable for crimes committed with their company's firearms. It is stated in the disclaimer of every instruction manual that comes with the firearm. What people use their guns for are uncontrolled by the gun maker so they are not held responsible.
Business and Engineering.
Get a manual from the maker or find a good gunsmith
The gun maker never sees a customer. Guns are sold to individuals not by the maker, but by a gun dealer. No, it is not the dealer's responsibility to ask a person what they are going to do with a gun.
Maker or manufacturer.
The weapon itself should be marked with the maker's name somewhere..
No violence is good.
A used or broken gun that the company or maker has replaced any of the worn or broken parts. It should be cheaper but just as good as a normal airsoft gun
Violence, as gun deaths are a subcategory of violence.
Mainly from the markings on the gun by the maker.
how long after convicted of doistic violence can you own a gun in Colorado