the link between social class and social mobility is social class ia an open system which means people are able to move up and down the social hierarchy resulting in acheiving social mobility but people may also move down the social hierarchy resulting in a lower social class this may occur if a person loses their income , wealth or status .
Social class can affect social mobility due to the resources and opportunities available to individuals in different classes. Those in higher social classes often have better access to education, networks, and financial resources which can help them advance in society. Conversely, individuals in lower social classes may face barriers such as limited educational opportunities and less access to networks that can hinder their mobility.
social mobility is when goes from one social class to another. for example a man with a working class job, is in the working class strata, but if he finds a middle class job, his strata would change.
Values such as hard work, education, financial independence, and social mobility were important to the new middle class at the turn of the century. They also valued consumerism and material success as a way to display their social status and aspirations. Additionally, ideas of progress, efficiency, and professionalism influenced their worldview during this period.
No, social class does not determine a person's character. A person's character is shaped by a combination of factors such as upbringing, personal experiences, values, and beliefs, rather than solely by social class.
Postmodernism views social class as a fluid and complex category that is influenced by various factors such as culture, identity, and power dynamics. It challenges the idea of fixed class structures and emphasizes the role of intersectionality in shaping individuals' experiences of class. Postmodernism also critiques traditional classifications of social class and highlights the need for recognizing the diversity and interconnectedness of different social groups.
Property I think
Max Weber believed that social class was determined by a combination of factors including wealth, power, and prestige. He argued that individuals' positions in society were influenced not just by their economic status, but also by their access to political influence and social status.
To be frank, the idea that social mobility could never happen in any case is a fallacy. Social mobility can and always does happen even where it's restricted. This is because we really cannot completely control the social interactions of people. That's not a very helpful answer to you question though. For a better answer, let's look at places where social mobility is marginal at best. Take India, for example, which has historically had poor social mobility because of its caste system. At the bottom of the caste system you have a class of people known as the untouchables. I'm no expert on sociology nor the history of India, but India has a huge wealth disparity and a lot of social problems because of its caste system. There have been repeated calls to end the caste system. When social mobility is restricted you get huge wealth disparities and socio-economic problems. You get an under-educated population and a small middle class (because the lower-classes cannot easily move into this class of people). If social mobility never happened, implying that everyone was static and their class was, say, determined at birth - I think this would merely breed conflict. Think of the aristocracy that was challenged by peasants during the French Revolution. It was called a revolution because change came of it. If change did not come of it, the violence would simply have been senseless - that's why I think it's infeasible to think of people never being socially mobile. You can take social mobility by force, if you must.
men and woman in social class learned how to socialize? think mcfly! i mean, how obvious is that! come on!
I think, Level.
it caused major separation in society, and the lack of social mobility in one's life-time.
the way we think the way we act increase durg abuse
I think it is plebeian
No, social class does not determine a person's character. A person's character is shaped by a combination of factors such as upbringing, personal experiences, values, and beliefs, rather than solely by social class.
what
I think it is the Industrial Revolution
i think from my social studies class that its Spain
There are multiple factors driving the move towards social class stratification, including economic inequality, globalization, cultural attitudes towards success and status, and historical legacies of class divisions. These factors contribute to the creation and reinforcement of social hierarchies that can perpetuate disparities in wealth, power, and opportunity within societies.
People think that drug addiction is a sign of weakness or a lack of willpower. They also think that it only affects a certain class of people. There is much more to it than that and addiction affects all classes equally.