Identify and select the correct order of steps in scientific inquiry?

Answer 1

5 and 7 Step Methods

The 5 Step Method:

1. define the problem
2. create a prediction that provides explanation
3. create a scientific procedure to test the ideas
4. observation of results in the procedure
5. form a conclusion based on all of the other steps.

The 7 Step Mehod:

1. Ask and define the question.
2. Gather information and resources through observation.
3. Form a hypothesis.
4. Perform one or more experiments and collect and sort data.
5. Analyze the data.
6. Interpret the data and make conclusions that point to a hypothesis.
7. Formulate a "final" or "finished" hypothesis.

With the investigation concluded, the published results will be verified by other investigators, and the "tested" knowledge integrated into a larger whole of scientific information.

More Information:

It is important to note that there is no one single scientific method. Every experiment is different and may or may not follow the exact steps; science is less structured than most realize. However, there are key elements of the experimental process that we can identify.

In experiments (and in everyday life), scientists (and non-scientists) use hypothetico-deductive reasoning, or "If...then logic" to identify and test problems and solutions.

The start of every experiment does not start with "asking a question." It actually starts just before that. If you think about it, you cannot ask a question without identifying a problem that you observe. You do not ask "how does an owl hunt at night?" without first observing that an owl successfully captures mice as a food source at night. So this is where we start -- observation.

Now we go to our question. You have just observed a natural phenomenon, and now comes the time to question why this is.

As is our nature, we set out to answer this question. But first we need a tentative solution to our problem/question in order to test this theory. This is called a hypothesis; an educated guess. It is important that this hypothesis be able to test in an experiment. In other words, your hypothesis cannot be "because ghosts are playing tricks", because this is untestable and outside the realm of science.

So we have our tentative answer to our problem/question, and now we need to test this hypothesis. But usually we don't rush head-on into a task without knowing what our result should be. Therefore, we make a prediction, which will explain our results.

We have our hypothesis that we're going to test, and we have our predicted result should the hypothesis be true. Finally, we get to test and perform the experiment.

If this test supports the hypothesis, then additional predictions may be made and another test is performed. If the test does not support the hypothesis, then revision of the hypothesis is needed and a retest is performed.

Application of hypothetico-deductive reasoningObservation: My flashlight doesn't work

Question: What's wrong with my flashlight?

Hypothesis: The flashlight's batteries are dead.

Prediction: If this hypothesis is correct

Experiment: and I replace the batteries with new ones,

Predicted Result: then the flashlight should work.
Step 1. Problem/Question

Step 2. Hypothesis

Step 3. Method/Experiment

Step 4. Conclusion

Answer 2

There are a number of steps of scientific research. These include asking a question, research, create a hypothesis, test hypothesis, analyze results and come to a conclusion, and present the results.

Answer 3

When you are involved in conducting a research project, you generally go through the

steps described below, either formally or informally. Some of these are directly involved in

designing the experiment to test the hypotheses required by the project. The following steps are

generally used in conducting a research project.

1. Review pertinent literature to learn what has been done in the field and to become

familiar enough with the field to allow you to discuss it with others. The best ideas often cross

disciplines and species, so a broad approach is important. For example, recent research in

controlling odors in swine waste has exciting implications for fly and nematode control.

2. Define your objectives and the hypotheses that you are going to test. You can't be

vague. You must be specific. A good hypothesis is:

a. Clear enough to be tested

b. Adequate to explain the phenomenon

c. Good enough to permit further prediction

d. As simple as possible

3. Specify the population on which research is to be conducted. For example,

specify whether you are going to determine the P requirements of papaya on the Kauai Branch

Station (a Typic Gibbsihumox), or the P requirements of papaya throughout the State, or the P

requirements of papaya in sand or solution culture. The types of experiments required to solve

these problems vary greatly in scope and complexity and also in resource requirements.

4. Evaluate the feasibility of testing the hypothesis. One should be relatively certain

that an experiment can be set up to adequately test the hypotheses with the available resources.

Therefore, a list should be made of the costs, materials, personnel, equipment, etc., to be sure

that adequate resources are available to carry out the research. If not, modifications will have to

be made to design the research to fit the available resources.

5. Select Research Procedure:

a. Selection of treatment design is very crucial and can make the difference

between success or failure in achieving the objectives. Should seek help of a statistical resource

person (statistician) or of others more experienced in the field. Statistical help should be sought

when planning an experiment rather than afterward when a statistician is expected to extract

meaningful conclusions from a poorly designed experiment. An example of a poor selection of

treatments is the experiment which demonstrated that each of three treatments, Scotch and water,

Gin and water, and Bourbon and water taken orally in sufficient quantities, produce some degree

of intoxication. Will this experiment provide information on which ingredient or mixture causes

intoxication? Why? How can this experiment be improved? An example related to agriculture is

an experiment with 2 treatments, Ammonium Sulfate and Calcium Nitrate, selected to determine

whether or not maize responds to N fertilizer on a Typic Paleudult soil. Will this experiment

provide the desired information? What is lacking? What sources of confusion are included in the

treatments?1.2

b. Selection of the sampling or experimental design and number of

replicates. This is the major topic of this course so this will not be discussed further other than to

comment that in general one should choose the simplest design that will provide the precision

you require.

c. Selection of measurements to be taken. With the computer it is now

possible to analyze large quantities of data and thus the researcher can gain considerably more

information about the crop, etc. than just the effects of the imposed variables on yield. For

example, with corn, are you going to measure just the yield of grain, or of ears, or of grain plus

stover? What about days to tasseling and silking? Height of ears, kernel depth, kernel weight,

etc. What about nutrient levels at tasseling, or weather conditions, especially if there are similar

experiments at other locations having different climates? With animal experiments, you can

measure just the increase in weight or also total food intake, components of blood, food

digestibility etc.

d. Selection of the unit of observation, i.e., the individual plant, one row, or a

whole plot, etc? One animal or a group of animals?

e. Control of border effects or effects of adjacent units on each other or

"competition". Proper use of border rows or plants and randomization of treatments to the

experimental units helps minimize border effects. Proper randomization of treatments to the

experimental unit is also required by statistical theory so be sure this is properly done.

f. Probable results: Make an outline of pertinent summary tables and

probable results. Using information gained in the literature review write out the results you

expect. Essentially perform the experiment in theory and predict the results expected.

g. Make an outline of statistical analyses to be performed. Before you plant

the first pot or plot or feed the first animal, you should have set up an outline of the statistical

analysis of your experiment to determine whether or not you are able to test the factors you wish

with the precision you desire. One of the best ways to do this is to write out the analysis of

variance table (source of variation and df) and determine the appropriate error terms for testing

the effects of interest. A cardinal rule is to be sure you can analyze the experiment yourself and

will not require a statistician to do it for you--he might not be there when you need him. Another

danger in this age of the computer and statistical programs, is to believe that you can just run the

data through the statistical program and the data will be analyzed for you. While this is true to a

certain extent, you must remember that the computer is a perfect idiot and does only what you

tell it to do. Therefore, if you do not know what to tell the computer to do and/or of you don't

know what the computer is doing, you may end up with a lot of useless output-garbage!! Also,

there is the little matter of interpreting all the computer output that you can get in a very short

time. This is your responsibility and you had better know what it is all about.

6. Selection of suitable measuring instruments and control of bias in data collection:

Measuring instruments should be sufficiently accurate for the precision required. Don't want a

gram balance (scale) to weigh watermelons or sugarcane. Experimental procedure should be free

of personal bias, i.e., if treatment effects must be graded (subjective evaluation) such as in1.3

herbicide, or disease control experiments, the treatments should be randomized and the grader

should not know what treatment he is grading until after he has graded it. Have two people do

the data collection, one grade and the other record.

7. Install experiment: Care should be taken in measuring treatment materials

(fertilizers, herbicides, or other chemicals, food rations, etc.) and the application of treatments to

the experimental units. Errors here can have disastrous effects on the experimental results. In

field experiments, you should personally check the bags of fertilizer or seed of varieties which

should be placed on each plot, to be certain that the correct fertilizers or variety will be applied

to the correct plot before any fertilizer is applied or any seed planted. Once fertilizer is applied to

a plot, it generally cannot be removed easily. With laboratory experiments or preparation of

various rations for feeding trials, check calculations and reagents or ingredients, etc., and set up a

system of formulating the treatments to minimize the possibility of errors.

8. Collect Data: Careful measurements should be made with the appropriate

instruments. It is better to collect too much data than not enough. Data should also be recorded

properly in a permanent notebook. In many studies data collection can be quite rapid and before

you know it you have data scattered in 6 notebooks, 3 folders, and 2 packs of paper towels!!

When it is time to analyze the data, it is a formidable task, especially if someone has used the

paper towels to dry their hands. Thus a little thought early in the experiment will save a lot of

time and grief later. Avoid recording data on loose sheets at all costs as this is one good way to

prolong your stay here by having to repeat experiments because the data were lost. Avoid fatigue

in collecting data as errors increase as one gets tired. Also avoid recopying data as this is a major

source of errors in experimental work. If data must be recopied, check figures against the

originals immediately. It is better to have two people do the checking, one read the original data

and the other read the copied data. When one person is making measurements and another

recording, have the person recording repeat the value being recorded. This will minimize errors.

9. Make a complete analysis of the data: Be sure to have a plan of analysis, e.g.,

which analysis and in what order will they be done? Interpret the results in the light of the

experimental conditions and hypotheses tested. Statistics do not prove anything and there is

always the possibility that your conclusions may be wrong. One must consider the consequences

of drawing an incorrect conclusion and modify the interpretation accordingly. Do not jump to a

conclusion just because an effect is significant. This is especially so if the conclusion doesn't

agree with previously established facts. The experimental data should be checked very carefully

if this occurs, as the results must make sense!

10. Finally, prepare a complete, correct, and readable report of the experiment. This

may be a report to the farmer or researcher or an extension publication. There is no such thing as

a negative result. If the null hypothesis is not rejected, it is positive evidence that there may be

no real difference among the treatments tested.

In summary, you should remember the 3 R's of experimentation:

1. Replicate: This provides a measure of variation (an error term) which is used in

evaluating the effects observed in the experiment. This is the only way that the validity of your1.4

conclusions from the experiment can be measured.

2. Randomize: Statistical theory requires the assignment of treatments to the

experimental units in a purely random manner. This prevents bias.

3. Request Help: Ask for help when in doubt about how to design, execute or

analyze your experiment. Not everyone is a statistician, but should know the important principles

of scientific experimentation. Be on guard against common pitfalls and ask for help when you

need it. Do this when planning an experiment, not after it is completed.

Answer 4

1. Ask a question

2. Do some research

3. make a hypothesis

4. Conduct an experiment

5. Record and Analyze data

6. Draw a conclusion

Answer 5

Firstly know the risks of it, the hypothesis, needed equipments & make a control and also send me an E-mail at syandam@hotmail.co.za