answersLogoWhite

0

The judgment in Temloc v Erril confirmed that where "Nil" is entered as the value of a liquidated damages clause this will be the only remedy available to the employer where works are not completed on time, i.e. he will be entitled to £0 in liquidated damages and will also be unable to claim unliquated damages at common law for breach of contract. Where an employer does not want to use the liquidated damages clause but wishes to keep available his remedy at common law the liquidated damages clause should be deleted.

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

What else can I help you with?