0
Want this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What does mutual conciliation mean?
Are you asking about Mutual MEDIATION?
What has the author B R Patil written?
B. R. Patil has written: 'Conciliation in India' -- subject(s): Industrial Mediation and conciliation, Mediation and conciliation, Industrial 'Collective bargaining practices in textile & non-textile industries in Coimbatore' -- subject(s): Collective bargaining
What is difference between mediation and conciliation?
Though the two terms have a number of similarities, there are also some differences between conciliation and mediation, no matter which definition is used. In both cases, a neutral third party seeks to help two, or possibly more, opposing sides find a suitable resolution to a conflict. In some cases, the differences between conciliation and mediation definitions will determine how that neutral third-party acts. No universal definition currently exists for these alternative forms of dispute resolution, but there are still some distinct differences. In some cases and jurisdictions, the differences between conciliation and mediation are determined by the amount of power the third party has. In mediation, the mediator will facilitate a discussion between the parties, and may or may not offer opinions on the strength of each side's argument. When no opinion is offered, it is called facilitative mediation. In cases where an opinion is offered, it is evaluative mediation. Overall, no matter which method is chosen, the mediator still does not have the right to impose his or her will on the two parties. This could be the major difference based on some definitions of conciliation and mediation. For example, a conciliator will not only offer an opinion on the relative strengths of the case, but also issue a binding opinion, if the parties agree to that ahead of time. The opinion offered is likely to be based on the law, but may factor in other less concrete considerations if the parties agree. This type of dispute resolution process is often more formal, simply because the decision will be binding, at least on a temporary basis. In some localities, the difference between conciliation and mediation is the same as the difference between facilitative mediation and evaluative mediation. In other words, under this definition of conciliation, the conciliator can still offer an opinion, but that opinion has no legal weight, though it may be based on legal concepts. Therefore, unless the parties agree, the conciliator's opinion makes no difference, but it may be used by one party or the other in court to bolster a case. No matter what definition is used, the major difference between conciliation and mediation ultimately is the power of the third party. In all cases, conciliation gives slightly more power to the third party than the mediation. Conciliation or mediation may be ordered by the court system as a way of resolving disputes and relieving some of the pressure on court calendars. This is especially true in the case of marriage dissolution in some countries, though it could also be used for labour disputes, or nearly any type of contract disagreement.
What is the difference between conciliation and mediation?
Though the two terms have a number of similarities, there are also some differences between conciliation and mediation, no matter which definition is used. In both cases, a neutral third party seeks to help two, or possibly more, opposing sides find a suitable resolution to a conflict. In some cases, the differences between conciliation and mediation definitions will determine how that neutral third-party acts. No universal definition currently exists for these alternative forms of dispute resolution, but there are still some distinct differences. In some cases and jurisdictions, the differences between conciliation and mediation are determined by the amount of power the third party has. In mediation, the mediator will facilitate a discussion between the parties, and may or may not offer opinions on the strength of each side's argument. When no opinion is offered, it is called facilitative mediation. In cases where an opinion is offered, it is evaluative mediation. Overall, no matter which method is chosen, the mediator still does not have the right to impose his or her will on the two parties. This could be the major difference based on some definitions of conciliation and mediation. For example, a conciliator will not only offer an opinion on the relative strengths of the case, but also issue a binding opinion, if the parties agree to that ahead of time. The opinion offered is likely to be based on the law, but may factor in other less concrete considerations if the parties agree. This type of dispute resolution process is often more formal, simply because the decision will be binding, at least on a temporary basis. In some localities, the difference between conciliation and mediation is the same as the difference between facilitative mediation and evaluative mediation. In other words, under this definition of conciliation, the conciliator can still offer an opinion, but that opinion has no legal weight, though it may be based on legal concepts. Therefore, unless the parties agree, the conciliator's opinion makes no difference, but it may be used by one party or the other in court to bolster a case. No matter what definition is used, the major difference between conciliation and mediation ultimately is the power of the third party. In all cases, conciliation gives slightly more power to the third party than the mediation. Conciliation or mediation may be ordered by the court system as a way of resolving disputes and relieving some of the pressure on court calendars. This is especially true in the case of marriage dissolution in some countries, though it could also be used for labour disputes, or nearly any type of contract disagreement.
What has the author C R Mitchell written?
C. R. Mitchell has written: 'Gestures of conciliation' -- subject(s): Conflict management, International Mediation, Mediation, International
What is the name of the organisation that settles a large number of labor disputes you south Africa?
commission for conciliation,mediation and arbitation
What is the difference between advocacy and mediation?
To me, a mediator, one who does the mediation, seeks to bring conciliation and reconciliation to both sides and a advocate, one who brings advocacy, represents the plaintiff in one side of the argument.
When a complaint is forwarded to tda F and N which one of the protected classes requires the complaint to be forwarded to federal mediation and conciliation service within 5 days?
When a complaint is forwarded to tda F and N the sex, age, race and disability protected classes requires the complaint to be forwarded to federal mediation and conciliation service within 5 days
What has the author Eileen B Hoffman written?
Eileen B. Hoffman has written: 'Resolving labor-management disputes' -- subject(s): Collective bargaining, Industrial Arbitration, Industrial Mediation and conciliation, Labor disputes 'Resolving labor-management disputes: a nine-country comparison' -- subject(s): Collective bargaining, Industrial Arbitration, Industrial Mediation and conciliation, Labor disputes
What has the author Dan Fernback written?
Dan Fernback has written: 'Recent court cases and administrative rulings interpreting Wisconsin's mediation-arbitration law' -- subject(s): Collective labor agreements, Digests, Industrial Arbitration, Industrial Mediation and conciliation, Municipal employees
What prefix is used for conciliation?
re - reconciliation
Is mediation legally binding?
mediation can be binding if a representative is used if not then its not binding snzbeyueen
