The Hay Job Evaluation System?

already exists.

Would you like to merge this question into it?

already exists as an alternate of this question.

Would you like to make it the primary and merge this question into it?

exists and is an alternate of .

THE HAY JOB EVALUATION SYSTEM The Hay Job Grading Scheme was developed in the early 1950's by E. N. Hay and Associates. It is a scheme which is based on the "points factor" approach. This is a common approach to job grading. The process has the following basic steps: A description of the job is made including such things as: expertise required, accountabilities, experience required, functions performed, financial impact of the job, freedom to decide and act, number of staff supervised, pre-eminence of the position, influence of the position within the company etc. The various aspects of the job given in the description are usually split into categories. For example, in the Hay system the categories are: ¨ Know How ¨ Problem Solving ¨ Accountability ¨ Working Conditions (This was included after the initial creation of the scheme in an attempt to enable the Hay system to be applied to blue collar occupations). Other systems may have different sets of categories. For example, the OCR system, uses the following categories: ¨ Knowledge, Skills and Experience ¨ Reasoning and Decision Making ¨ Communication and Influence ¨ Accountability and Responsibility The description of the job is done under the headings given by the job grading system's categories. This description of the job is then compared with a standard set of descriptors (i.e. a set of statements from the job grading manual which describe the aspects of a job) and the most appropriate descriptors, in each category, for that job are selected from the set. So, for the Hay system, a manual with descriptors in each of the above categories is used to grade the job. The job grader selects the descriptor which (in their view) most accurately describes that category of the job. (An example of a Hay descriptor under the category of "Know How" is: "Jobs requiring procedural or systematic proficiency, which may involve a facility in the use of specialized equipment.") Each descriptor has a score associated with it. For example, in the Hay system there is a point score for each of "Know How", "Problem Solving" and "Accountability". These factor points are then used to calculate a total "points factor" score for that job. This task is repeated for all jobs within the company. The tally score for each job is then interpreted as the importance of that job within the company relative to the other jobs within the company. If the system is related to pay, then a level of pay is associated with each tally score. Often, tally scores are grouped into a single pay level. For example, scores from 100 to 150 may all be paid $35,000. Using this process, the claim is that these systems provide a fair and equitable method of rating the relative importance of all jobs in a company, from the CEO to the part-time janitor. thus it purportedly gives equal pay for work of equal value within a company. In fact, the Hay system was originally designed specifically for the evaluation of managerial jobs. As stated by Hay: "We have seen that the Guide Chart Profile Method was designed for a specific purpose - evaluating managerial and technical jobs in order to get equitable salary standards." In the personnel journals of the time, Hay justified his system as a system that would "fight for better salaries for corporate executives" Right from its inception, the Hay system was designed with a bias toward managerial and executive levels. The Hay scheme has also tried to construct a comparison of pay levels between companies. This is done by including in the Hay scheme: The use of generic descriptors The Hay manual has a set of "common descriptors" which are applied for all jobs in all companies. (Although there is the possibility of including "un-common descriptors" this makes the comparison of jobs difficult and so is avoided whenever possible.) The claim is that the use of these common descriptors means you are comparing "like with like" across an industry. Non use of specialized terms or definitions of terms in the generic descriptors. (For example, the Hay descriptor presented above in step 3 uses very general wording.) So, rather than use words such as "expert in communications theory" the more generic wording such as "determinative mastery of principles" are used. The use of employment market surveys of pay to construct a relationship between Hay Scores of similar jobs in different companies and their corresponding pay. For example, in the information technology industry, a Hay score of 600 may (on average) be approximately associated with a pay of $40,000. Using this approach, an employer may claim that a job with a Hay score of 600 and a salary of $50,000 is over paid. Although this methodology may sound quite reasonable there are, however, many problems with these schemes which are not immediately apparent. Some of these problems, in regard to the Hay System, are discussed below. 2. The 15% Rule The basis for the point allocation in the Hay Scheme is the so-called Weber's Law. This law is based on a range of "psychometric" experiments published in 1948. In these results experimenters noted that when the physical weight of two objects differed by more than 15%, people could distinguish between their weights just by lifting them. Hay xtrapolated this result to the ability to distinguish between human behaviors and based his points factor allocation tables upon this result. The validity of this extrapolation has been questioned. For example, is it valid to extrapolate this rule from weight to the ability to distinguish between job-related activities? 3. It is all in the Application There are two key problems with generic descriptors. Firstly, they are unavoidably vague and secondly, they are culturally biased. Because the descriptors are generic, they are vague. Therefore, the application of these descriptors to a job involves a high degree of subjectivity. This means the biases of the person (or group) implementing the scheme will result in a bias in the rating of jobs. Hay has attempted to address this issue, however, management control of the implementation of the scheme will most likely result in the scheme giving the results management wants whether or not the result is fair. Turning to the issue of cultural bias, as stated above, a "descriptor" is a sentence which is designed to describe an aspect of a job. Just as there is no such thing as a society without a culture, there is no such thing as a "value free" descriptor. Hence, generic descriptors intrinsically favor certain job types. The Hay system suffers at least three aspects of cultural bias. It is techno-centric and hierarchical as well as strongly based on 1950's USA corporate culture. 4. Technology verses the Human Factor Hay is "techno-centric". The Hay descriptor quoted above (in step 3 of the Introduction above) is an example. This descriptor refers to "a facility to use special equipment". A common criticism of Hay is that workers who operate or work with equipment and technology rate higher than those who work with people (eg. customers). This has a side effect of introducing a gender bias into the system, since male workers are more prevalent in technology related jobs and female workers tend to occupy "people related" jobs. The Hay Group is aware its methodology has been criticized on the grounds of gender bias. In an attempt to deal with this criticism it has produced a Code of Practice. However, there is no guarantee an employer using Hay will follow this code. ===
9 people found this useful

How do you answer 'How do you determine or evaluate success' in a job interview?

Answer interview success! . \nAs a professional recruiter I get this question every day. Success is when the employer offers you a job on the spot. This does not always apply because an additional representative may be involved and there will be multiple inverviews for the job. Usually the interv ( Full Answer )

What are non-quantitative approaches to job evaluation?

Job evaluation is a practical technique, designed to enable trained and experienced staff to judge the size of one job relative to others. It does not directly determine pay levels, but will establish the basis for an internal ranking of jobs. The two most common methods of job evaluation that hav ( Full Answer )

How is a system of inquiry developed to evaluate ethical behavior?

Developing the Code of Conduct and putting compliance in place to implement the code of ethics is not enough to maintain high ethical standards within an organization. The development of a strong set of ethical standards for an employee's job related business conduct requires each individual's per ( Full Answer )

What are the effects of job evaluation and merit rating on wrkers performance?

Job Evaluation is concerned with measuring the demands the job places on its holder. Most factors that contribute to this job pressure and are regarded as important for the effective performance of the job, e.g. physical strength required, knowledge of mathematics required, are assessed and the resu ( Full Answer )

Describe how a organization should perform job evaluation?

Companies and organizations should perform job evaluations in amanner that best fits the company. For instance, companies withmany remote employees may choose to have the employees completeonline self-evaluations, and phone or video chat evaluations withtheir supervisors.

What are quantitative approaches to job evaluation?

This term regards methodologies in reviewing and deciding uponcareer options. Quantitative methods are based on numericalapproaches such as income, productivity, time investiture. andother statistical indicators.

What is the importance of Job Evaluation in an organization?

importance of job evaluation:- . 1.rational wage structure . 2.removal of inequalities . 3.good industrial relations . 4.proper emphasis on job factors . 5.scientific selection and recruitment . 6.performance appraisal . and development . 8.multifarious use

What do you mean by Job evaluation and explain the process of job evaluation?

meaning of Job evaluation :- Job evaluation is a systematic way of determining the value/worth of a job in relation to other jobs in an organisation. It tries to make a systematic comparison between jobs to assess their relative worth for the purpose of establishing a rational pay structure. Job ( Full Answer )

Difference between job evaluation and merit rating?

Ans. Merit Rating vs. Job Evaluation. The points of difference between merit rating and job evaluation are as under: I.Merit rating is concerned with the differences among the employees in terms of their performance. That is why, it is also termed as 'performance appraisal'. But job evaluation is t ( Full Answer )

What was Mary Ludwig Hays job?

Mary Ludwig Hays was in the battle of Monmouth with her husband. She was hauling water to the weary men while her husband was in the battle. When her husband was unable to fight, she took his place.

Discuss advantages of job evaluation?

The advantages of job evaluation are as follow: Job evaluation is: -Objective and logical -It is fair, it eliminates any managerial bias -It is viewed favourably by industrial tribunals

What is the Peromnes's job evaluation scale?

Peromnes refers to a job evaluation system which scores jobs on a number of factors such as problem solving, pressure of work, job impact, consequence of judgement, educational qualifications, training and experience required. The aggregate score is applied to a sliding scale to determine job grade ( Full Answer )

Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of job evaluation?

WikiAnswers will not do your homework for you. Nor will it write your discussion paper, critiques, summaries or essays. That is considered cheating. If you have a specific question in the subject we are more than willing to help.

Disadvantages of job evaluation?

implementaion of quite simple methods can be costly and time consuming it subjectiviyty it relies on the human judgement, thus the human influence can not be ruled out.

What is evaluation systems?

An evaluation system refers to a system or program that is used todetermine the importance, or worth of something.

What is the problem of evaluating management jobs?

Hay system evaluate personnel on their knowledge of the job, their responsibility, and their ability to solve problems, but this is difficult to use in administrative work, because in these kind of works such as managing the result can't be seen easily and also tangible and the product cant be seen ( Full Answer )

How is job evaluation related to the payment of just wages?

A job evaluation is a means of determining whether an employee is effective in his position and becoming more valuable to the company. A good evaluation should result in higher wages. A bad evaluation should lead to reeducation of the employee and an eventual increase in pay or retention at the same ( Full Answer )

Discuss the evaluation and the various system of organization development?

OD is mainly ensuring the organization arrives its goals byimproving the individual and group performance. OD is focused athuman behaviors rather than organizational structure. OrganizationDevelopment is a description of change needed in the organizationif it is to reach its future goals. HR develop ( Full Answer )

When is a job evaluation used?

Job evaluation is a methodical way of shaping the value/worth ofa job with respect to other jobs in an organization. It tries toconstruct a methodical comparison between jobs to evaluate theircomparative importance for the rationale of establishing a balancedpay structure. Job evaluation needs to be ( Full Answer )

Difference between job evaluation and performance appraisal?

A job evaluation is a way of determining the worth of a job versusother jobs in an organization to establish rational pay. Aperformance appraisal is a review of an employee's performance oftheir responsibilities.

How might a system of peer evaluation help you in your supervision of the department?

it helps you because people would be allowed to tell you the truth in how they view your leadership. it breaks down barriers of communication that exist in the workplace. everything has to be taken with a grain of salt but there will be things, strands of commonality that you'll hear from different ( Full Answer )

Evaluating your computer system is important when?

If you mean security i say at least one a week or every other week. I use Personal Software Inspector. They allow you to check and see what software on your computer is causing you the most harm. You can find more information about it here: personal / Check t ( Full Answer )

What is hay baling system?

hay bailing systyem is a system of steps farmers/ranchers use to move grass from the field to the barn or holding facility. this is important because animals will starve during winter when there is no fresh green grass to eat. when grass is cut the nutritional value is no lost but is frozen at that ( Full Answer )

What is to evaluate a system?

"Evaluate a system" could mean several different things. I am somewhat confused as you asked this question under the following categories: Database Programming, Algebra and Calculus. Under Database Programming, I am not sure. However, I would imagine it would mean to describe the effectiveness of ( Full Answer )

How does hay help cows digestive system?

It is a roughage which does not break down as quickly or as easily as other feedstuffs do like alfalfa, grain, or green grass does. This way the digestion process is prolonged and prevents the animal from bloating because the feed isn't too rich. Hay will not help a cow's digestive system, however, ( Full Answer )

Why is planning and evaluation necessary in the educational system?

Planning and evaluation is necessary in the educational system in the sense that we could be able to align actions with resources on what we want for our students, evaluation is a strategy or way to testify the learning of the students whether they learn something or none.

How does one ensure that job evaluation evaluates the job not the man?

A job evaluation must assess skills, not the personality of the individual. To be sure an evaluation properly evaluates skills, the supervisor / manager must be able to clearly define: . What specific skills will be evaluated. . Specific goals related to those skills. . Specific objectives to m ( Full Answer )

How do you answer what is important to know about you while evaluating you for this job?

It depends on the type of job and your personality. It's tough but people are basically self-serving. Answer with something like you see it as a stepping stone to management (with a good reason why you want to be there showing you have given it some research) or you need the ojt etc, something that ( Full Answer )

What benefits does communicating the results of OHS system evaluations to stakeholders have?

Employees, are the people that deal, on a daily basis withthe processes of machinary, equiptment, functions or activities that transforms inputs into outputs. They are in the position to know what safety matters relate to those processes, Managers / leaders that have a true concern with safety will ( Full Answer )

What is a Job evaluation system?

Job evaluation is system that is prepared for the evaluation of the employees. And the performance of the employees according to the evaluation system.

What is the purpose of having a job evaluation?

The purpose of a job evaluation is to produce a defensive ranking of jobs on which a rational and acceptable pay structure can be built. It tries to assess jobs and not people.