0
What else can I help you with?
The South thought they would get more weapons from if they needed them.?
Europe
Why did the cold war result in an arms race?
Because there was no true defense against nuclear weapons. Once both sides had nuclear weapons, the only way to "protect" themselves from the other side was to have so many more nuclear weapons that even if their enemies used all of their nuclear weapons, there would still be nuclear weapons to shoot back with. That way, nobody would use nuclear weapons, because they could never actually "win" that way. This thought process was referred to as Mutually Assured Destruction, or MAD.
What advantage did the American military have in the Vietnam war?
More powerful weapons
Why did the issue of tariffs add to growing conflict between the north and south?
southerners thought the taz helped one region more than another
Why did people in the south refer the civil war as rich mans war and poor mans fight?
People in the South referred to the Civil War as "The rich mans' war and the poor mans' fight" because the North [the rich men] due to the industrial revolution had more money and you tactics and weapons one might use in a major war. While the South [the poor men] were still economically based through agriculture and did not have the extra money the North had because they stayed that way and did not industrialised the South had to use more common weapons and different tactics to match up with the weapons they had to use.
The South thought they would get more weapons from if they needed them.?
Europe
The South thought they would get more weapons from if they needed them?
During the Civil War, the South believed they could acquire more weapons if needed due to their strong tradition of hunting and marksmanship, as well as their access to local gunsmiths. Additionally, some Southern states had established armories or acquired weapons from Europe through blockade running. However, the South's lack of industrial capacity and resources ultimately limited their ability to produce and supply weapons in comparison to the North.
In a war between Namibia and south Africa who would win?
South Africa would most likely win as it is a richer country with a lot more people and weapons.
N a war between namibia and south Africa who would win?
South Africa would most likely win as it is a richer country with a lot more people and weapons.
Who had the most weapons in the civil war?
The North (Union) had more weapons as it was more highly industrialized than the South
If south had won Gettysburg what would have changed?
The war may have continued abit longer than 1865 (when it ended); but sooner or later the South would have lost...no more men, no more weapons. The North produced their own rifles and revolvers (and ammunition), and had far more men than the south did.
Who is more powerful the south or the north?
at first the south had an advantage but it turned tables when the south started running out of amunition and the north had all the industries back then so south had no way of getting weapons so i would say the north was more powerful when the south ran out of amunition
Why did the British invade the South?
They thought there were more Loyalist in the south to help them
What were the effects of war in south?
The south was not as powerful as the north. The north had more advantages than the south. The south had less transportation and not as many weapons.
How did the Us respond to dictators in Germany and japan?
With lethal military and covert force. they were scared of what they thought would happen. So they gathered more of weapons and military men to help.
What if nuclear weapons had never been developed?
WW2 would have lasted at least a year longer, millions more would have died, and japan would have been partitioned into communist north japan and free south japan.
Why did the cold war result in an arms race?
Because there was no true defense against nuclear weapons. Once both sides had nuclear weapons, the only way to "protect" themselves from the other side was to have so many more nuclear weapons that even if their enemies used all of their nuclear weapons, there would still be nuclear weapons to shoot back with. That way, nobody would use nuclear weapons, because they could never actually "win" that way. This thought process was referred to as Mutually Assured Destruction, or MAD.
