The Southern colonies were the ones with the big plantations, where they needed lots of people to work the fields. And slaves were the cheapest labor force available. New York and New Jersey didn't have as much large-scale farming, so not as much use for slaves.
One reason slavery was less prevalent in the northern colonies was because they did not have has many large farms that needed slaves. Slavery in the United States ended in 1865.
politics
Ferderick Douglass
The raid headed by John Brown on the Federal arsenal at Harper's Ferry in Virginia was ended by Colonel Robert E. Lee's force of US Marines. Brown's idea was to gain arms and then rally slaves to revolt for their freedom. It was an attempt by a small band of men to begin the end of slavery in the USA. No slaves rallied to Brown's cause. Brown was convicted of treason and hung in 1859. The armed attempt by Brown, however made him a martyr for radical anti slavery abolitionists in the North. In matters such as the movement to end slavery, acts as those performed by Brown, served as a lightning rod to rally as much Northern support as it could.
They had far fewer large cities than the southern states. They generally had less enslaved labor than the southern states.
It was more-or-less a draw. Neither army was destroyed, though the casualities were high. Eventually the Confederates (Bragg) withdrew, so it was chalked-up as a Northern victory under Rosecrans.
From his appointment until Grant's Overland Offensive of1864, Lee was able to stave off every general who led the Army of the Potomac against him. His audacious spoiling attacks sent general after general back to Washington in defeat and disgrace. Unfortunately, he was much less capable when mounting offensives on northern soil, but his aggressive elastic defense of Northern Virginia was little short of supernatural.
It was difficult to transport slaves to the North.
No. Slavery also existed in the Northern colonies before and after the American Revolution. It became less common by 1790 in the north.
There was not less slaves in the southern colonies than the northern colonies. The northern colonies were based more on indursty, where they mostly did their work by themselves. The south was based off of economy and plantations, so they needed a lot of workers. (slaves.)
yes
The middle colonies had milder temperatures than the northern colonies. Also, the land was suitable for growing many more crops. The land in the northern colonies was hard and rocky, but the land in the middle colonies was less rocky and the soil was more fertile.
The middle colonies had milder temperatures than the northern colonies. Also, the land was suitable for growing many more crops. The land in the northern colonies was hard and rocky, but the land in the middle colonies was less rocky and the soil was more fertile.
1. Grain production 2. Less slavery 3. Quakers 4. Slavery 5. Cattle
The Puritans did agree with slavery. They saw it as in agreement with the Bible, but slavery in the Massachusetts colonies was regarded as slightly less harsh than the slavery in the southern colonies because the Puritans also believed that it was their responsibility to provide for the slaves' well being, both physically and spiritually.Source: http://www.usconstitution.net/consttop_slav.html
Slavery during the colonial time was profitable for both the northern and southern colonies. However, southern economies depended so steeply on the agricultural goods produced in vast quantities. The north on the other hand were primarily based on commercial economies which heavily relied on their numerous ports which required less slave labor.
It didnt, if slavery had been banned in the beginning then none of the southern colonies would have joined america. The compromise allowed for both sides to be more or less happy.
A key difference was their organisational structure. The French instituted a very centralised system, where laws passed in Paris contolled the colonies. The British on the other hand insituted a less authoritarian, decentralised system, where a given colony would be allowed a certain degree of discretion to act.
Less than 1 in 10,000