answersLogoWhite

0

Thomas Hobbes claimed that life in the state of nature would be the "war of all against all" and it would seem "solitary, poor, nasty, brutish and short."

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about Philosophy

What philosopher argued for a monarchy?

Thomas Hobbes argued for a monarchy in his work "Leviathan", advocating for a strong central authority to maintain order and prevent the state of nature which he believed was characterized by chaos and violence.


How did thomas hobbes view human nature?

Thomas Hobbes believed that human nature was inherently selfish and driven by a desire for power and self-preservation. He argued that in a state of nature, without a governing authority, individuals would be in a constant state of conflict with one another.


What was Thomas Hobbes's view of human nature?

Thomas Hobbes believed that human nature is inherently selfish and driven by a desire for power and self-preservation. He argued that without strong government control, humans would live in a state of perpetual conflict and chaos.


Which philosopher believes the state of nature is a warof all against all?

Thomas Hobbes believed that the state of nature is a "war of all against all" in which life is "solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short." He argued that in this state, individuals act out of self-interest and competition for resources, leading to conflict and insecurity.


Who is the philosopher argued that under the state of nature life is nasty brutish and short?

Thomas Hobbes argued that in the state of nature life is "nasty, brutish, and short" due to the absence of a central authority to maintain order and prevent conflict. According to Hobbes, individuals in the state of nature are driven by self-interest and a constant struggle for power, leading to a condition of war of all against all.

Related Questions

What philosopher argued for a monarchy?

Thomas Hobbes argued for a monarchy in his work "Leviathan", advocating for a strong central authority to maintain order and prevent the state of nature which he believed was characterized by chaos and violence.


How did thomas hobbes view human nature?

Thomas Hobbes believed that human nature was inherently selfish and driven by a desire for power and self-preservation. He argued that in a state of nature, without a governing authority, individuals would be in a constant state of conflict with one another.


What was Thomas Hobbes's view of human nature?

Thomas Hobbes believed that human nature is inherently selfish and driven by a desire for power and self-preservation. He argued that without strong government control, humans would live in a state of perpetual conflict and chaos.


Which philosopher believes the state of nature is a warof all against all?

Thomas Hobbes believed that the state of nature is a "war of all against all" in which life is "solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short." He argued that in this state, individuals act out of self-interest and competition for resources, leading to conflict and insecurity.


Who is the philosopher argued that under the state of nature life is nasty brutish and short?

Thomas Hobbes argued that in the state of nature life is "nasty, brutish, and short" due to the absence of a central authority to maintain order and prevent conflict. According to Hobbes, individuals in the state of nature are driven by self-interest and a constant struggle for power, leading to a condition of war of all against all.


How did Thomas Hobbes feel about slavery?

Thomas Hobbes believed that slavery was a natural consequence of war and the state of nature. He argued that in a state of war, individuals could enslave those they defeated in order to preserve their own lives and security. Hobbes saw slavery as a means of maintaining order and preventing chaos in society.


What did thomas hobbes think of human beings?

Thomas Hobbes believed that humans were naturally selfish, competitive, and driven by a desire for power and self-preservation. He argued that in a state of nature, without government or authority to keep them in check, humans would be in a constant state of war with one another.


According to Thomas Hobbes in the state of nature every person had complete?

According to Thomas Hobbes, in the state of nature every person had complete liberty. He proposed that the pure state of nature is the natural condition of mankind.


What were Thomas Hobbes ideas about human nature?

Thomas Hobbes believed that human nature is inherently selfish and competitive, leading to a state of constant conflict. He argued that the best way to prevent chaos and ensure societal order was through a strong central authority or sovereign to maintain control and enforce laws.


What describes Thomas Hobbes's view of human nature?

Thomas Hobbes believed that human nature is inherently selfish and driven by a desire for power and self-preservation. He argued that in a state of nature without a governing authority, humans would be in a constant state of conflict and competition. Therefore, Hobbes believed in the necessity of a strong central government to maintain order and prevent chaos.


What did Thomas Hobbes argue?

Thomas Hobbes argued that human nature is inherently self-interested and driven by a desire for power. He believed that in the state of nature, without a governing authority, life would be "solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short." Hobbes advocated for a social contract whereby individuals relinquish some freedoms to a sovereign ruler in exchange for protection and stability.


What is Thomas Hobbes's view of human nature?

Thomas Hobbes believed that human nature is inherently selfish, competitive, and driven by a desire for power and self-preservation. He argued that in the state of nature, without governance and authority, individuals would be in a constant state of war against each other. This view influenced his advocacy for a strong central authority to maintain order and prevent chaos in society.