Yes, 2008 was a leap year. The next one will be 2012.
No, the last leap year was 2008 and the next one is 2012- every four years!
No - see related questions
Yes it is
No, 2009 was not a leap year.
No, 2008 and 2012 are.
No, odd numbered years are not Leap Years
No, 1909 was not a leap year.
3 years, as 2012 was the next leap year after 2009.
2013 Actually, the first leap year was 2000, and the second was 2004. The third was 2008. Therefore, the year after the third leap year of this century was really 2009.
The number of days in the year 2009 were 365. It was not a leap year so there was not an extra day.
2009 was not a leap year, so there was no 29th of February in 2009.
February has 29 days in a leap year == February has 29 days during a leap year for the Gregorian calender instead of the regular 28. Every year that is divisible by four is a leap year. 2008/4 502 Leap year 2009/4 502.25 No leap year. http://www.timeanddate.com/date/leapyear.html
2009 was not a leap year, and therefore February 2009 contained 28 days.
No, 2009 did not have a leap second.
The next leap year will be in 2012 and the last leap year was in 2008______________________________Leap years occur in every year where the number is evenly divisible by four, so 2004, 2008, and 2016 are all leap years.There are two exceptions:1. Year numbers that are evenly divisible by 100 are not leap years, so 1800 and 1900 and 2100 are NOT leap years. Except...2. Year numbers that are evenly divisible by 400 ARE leap years, so 1600 and 2000 were, and 2400 will be.Last Leap Year was '2008'. Next Leap Year is '2012'.If any year is divisible by 4 but not divisible by 100, then its a Leap Year. e.g. 2008.ORIf any year is divisible by 400, then its a Leap Year. e.g. 2000.2012 was the first leap year after 2009.
2009 was not a leap year so there was no Feb 29th in it
because of the Olympics in that year it would have been a leap year so 29
3080 will be a leap year.
1776 was a leap year