Drugged them.
Macduff
Macbeth is talking about the witches' prophecy to Banquo "Thou shalt get kings thou thou be none". From this Macbeth infers (although the witches did not actually say so) that his children would not be kings. Macbeth translates "thou shalt get kings" into Banquo being the father to "a line of kings". Well, the witches only said "kings"--they didn't say it was more than two. Then he imagines that none of his children would be kings with a couple of synechdoches: he describes the crown as fruitless (without children) and the sceptre as barren (incapable of having children) when it is the king, himself, which he imagines as fruitless and barren. I cannot hear the phrase "a fruitless crown" without imagining Carmen Miranda. Sorry if I have now put this image in your head.
He shall get kings though he be none.
the kings men
All medieval kings got special treatment compared to the way commoners were treated.
Kings and nobles, priests and priestesses, commoners, dependant clients, and slaves.
There have been eight British kings named Edward.
There are kings and Rulers in the bible because the Bible was written at a time where the majority of the known world was run by rulers and Kings. The stories and events that are depicted in the Bible are based and are true events.
They were, from 1877 to 1948.
No. It was under rule of Hindu Kings No. It was under rule of Hindu Kings
It gave him the faith and and the determination to lead the world to a better place
buckingham palace
Banastre Tarleton
delayed the movement of the British into North Carolina
delayed the movement of the British into North Carolina (A+)
There were no Indian kings. Only under the British raj did a single entity come to exist.