I would personally answer no, but it is an opinion questions. While perhaps necessary to win the war, the was still unethical.
Unethical because:
-goals for the march included burning crops, killing livestock, and consuming supplies to demoralize the South.
- Sherman and Army wrecked miles of railroad, seized horses and mules, and confiscated millions of pounds of corn and fodder.
- brought civilians into the war/battle when it should have just been military vs military, and
caused soldiers to take advantage of the wide open instructions that Sherman had issued before the march.
The scorched earth strategy
Sherman. It was a brilliant new strategy, which shortened the war by mionths, at almost nil casualties.
In its' day, it represented "Total War", just as the Atomic Bomb did in WWII.
he stared in Atlanta and moved to Savannah.
Punitive raids on the civilian mainstay of the Confederacy.
To starve the Confederate troops in the field by destroying the farms and railroads.
sherman went throught the south on a raid that was known as "shermans" march
March to Sea
Sherman's March to the Sea
Savannah
1864
From Atlanta to Savannah
no one
Savannah
savannah
Georgia
yes